← Library

Jungian Analysis

Jung
«Who looks outside, dreams. Who looks inside, awakens.»
Definition

Jungian analysis (analytical psychology) is a depth psychotherapy aimed at individuation: becoming a whole person through the awareness and integration of unconscious contents — the shadow, anima/animus, archetypes. The key idea: the psyche strives toward wholeness, and symptoms are messages of the unconscious pointing to what requires integration.

Founder(s) and history

Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961) was a Swiss psychiatrist and psychotherapist, the creator of analytical psychology. He was born in Kesswil (Switzerland), studied medicine at the University of Basel, and then worked at the Burghölzli — the psychiatric clinic of the University of Zurich under Eugen Bleuler.

At the Burghölzli Jung developed the word-association experiment (100 stimulus words, measurement of reaction time), which confirmed the existence of unconscious complexes. The results drew Freud's attention: in 1906 their collaboration began. Freud saw Jung as a successor, but by 1912–1913 the divergences had become insurmountable. Jung rejected the reduction of libido to sexual energy, insisting on its understanding as general psychic energy.

After the break with Freud, Jung went through a deep inner crisis (1913–1918), which he documented in the Red Book (Liber Novus, published only in 2009). This period of confrontation with the unconscious became the source of most of his key ideas: archetypes, active imagination, individuation.

In 1948, in Küsnacht (near Zurich), the C. G. Jung Institute was founded — a training center for Jungian analysts.

Key successors:

  • Marie-Louise von Franz (1915–1998) — the classical school, analysis of fairy tales and alchemy
  • Erich Neumann (1905–1960) — stages of the development of consciousness, the archetype of the Great Mother
  • James Hillman (1926–2011) — archetypal psychology: soul, multiplicity, imagination
  • Michael Fordham (1905–1995) — the developmental school, a bridge to object relations theory
  • Edward Edinger (1922–1998) — the Ego–Self axis, the individuation process
  • Dora Kalff (1904–1990) — sandplay therapy
  • Andrew Samuels (b. 1949) — the classification of three post-Jungian schools
Key concepts

Individuation

The central concept of Jungian analysis. The process of becoming who one potentially is — not through improvement, but through the integration of all parts of the psyche, including the rejected ones. Individuation is a lifelong process, especially active in the second half of life.

Stages:

1. Integration of the Shadow — awareness and acceptance of the rejected sides of the personality 2. Meeting with Anima/Animus — awareness of the contrasexual principle, work with projections onto partners 3. Meeting with the Self — establishing the Ego–Self axis, the experience of wholeness

Archetypes

Universal patterns (primordial images) in the collective unconscious. Archetypes are not concrete images, but structural predispositions that are filled with individual content.

Main archetypes:

  • Persona — the social "mask", a necessary compromise between individuality and society. Danger — identification with the Persona and loss of contact with the true "I"
  • Shadow — the repressed, rejected aspects of the personality. Contains both the destructive and the creative. Projected onto people who evoke strong dislike
  • Anima/Animus — the contrasexual archetype. Anima is the unconscious feminine side of the male psyche; Animus is the masculine side of the female psyche. A bridge to the collective unconscious. Projected onto partners
  • Self — the central archetype of wholeness. Both the center and the periphery of the psyche. The aim of individuation is a conscious connection of the Ego with the Self. Symbols of the Self: mandala, the divine child, the wise old man

Collective unconscious

The deep layer of the psyche, common to all humanity. It is not acquired through individual experience but is inherited as a structure. It contains archetypes. It manifests through myths, fairy tales, religious symbols, dreams.

Jung distinguished the personal unconscious (individual, repressed) from the collective unconscious (universal, archetypal). Freud recognized only the first.

Complexes

Emotionally charged groups of ideas, images, and memories that act as autonomous subpersonalities. Each complex has an archetypal core (universal) and an individual "cover" (personal experience). Everyone has complexes; pathology arises when a complex gains excessive autonomy and "captures" the Ego.

Active imagination

A technique of direct dialogue with the unconscious. Relaxation → observing the images → dialogue with them → expression (drawing, text, movement) → integration. Requires a strengthened Ego; contraindicated in psychotic states.

Work with dreams

Jung regarded dreams not as disguised wishes (as in Freud), but as direct messages of the unconscious. Methods: circular associations (around the image, not along a chain), amplification (expansion through myths, fairy tales, culture), subjective and objective levels of interpretation. Series of dreams matter more than single dreams.

Psychological types

Two attitudes (extraversion and introversion) and four functions (thinking, feeling, sensation, intuition) yield eight types. The leading function is the most developed one. The inferior function is the least developed — the "door to the unconscious".

The MBTI was created on the basis of Jung's typology, but many Jungian analysts consider it a simplification of the original model.

Therapy format
  • Frequency: 1–2 times a week (less often — 3 times)
  • Length of session: 50 minutes
  • Duration: from 1 year to several years; individuation is understood as a lifelong process, analysis as its catalyst
  • Setting: face to face (unlike classical psychoanalysis)
  • Methods: dream analysis, active imagination, work with symbols, amplification, analysis of transference/countertransference, sandplay therapy
  • The analyst is not a "clean screen", but a real person entering into an authentic dialogue
Evidence base
  • Roesler (2013) — a systematic review: Jungian psychotherapy shows significant improvements on the level of symptoms, interpersonal problems, and personality structure. The results are stable — up to 6 years after the end of therapy
  • Roesler (2014) — meta-review: the effect size of Jungian psychotherapy (d = 0.97) is comparable to CBT (d = 0.88)
  • Keller et al. (2002) — naturalistic study in Germany: after Jungian therapy, reduction of sick days from 16 to 8, and hospitalization days from 8 to 1
  • Sattel et al. (2017) — Jungian therapy is effective in psychosomatic disorders, anxiety, depression, and personality-functioning disturbances

The main researcher is Christian Roesler (Freiburg). Top-level RCTs (level I) are still absent — effectiveness in real practice has been demonstrated, but not efficacy under strictly controlled conditions. This is linked to the length of the therapy and the impossibility of manualizing it.

Limitations
  • Length and intensity. Jungian analysis is not a fast method. The process of individuation unfolds over years. This limits accessibility and increases cost
  • Limited number of RCTs. The method is difficult to study in the format of randomized trials: the therapy is long, individualized, non-manualizable. The evidence base rests mainly on naturalistic studies
  • Not for acute states. Jungian analysis is not suitable as a first-line intervention in acute disorders, suicidal risk, severe addictions. Basic Ego stability is required
  • Risk of inflation. Immersion in archetypal material can lead to "Ego inflation" — identification with archetypes (omnipotence, messianism). Requires an experienced analyst capable of keeping grounding
  • Scientific appearance vs science. The concepts of the collective unconscious, synchronicity, and alchemical symbolism are criticized by empirical science. They work clinically, but are hard to verify
  • Cultural limits of the archetypes. The universality of the archetypes is contested: critics point out that the "universal" images may mainly reflect the European mythological tradition
  • High demands on the analyst. A Jungian analyst must undergo their own deep analysis and have broad erudition in mythology, religion, and art. Training is long and demanding
Setting and the analyst's stanceFace to face, dialogue, real presence

Every session is a meeting of two unconsciouses. You are not above the analysand — you are also being transformed in this work

A symptom, an image, a dream — these are not obstacles but messages from the Self. Listen; do not hurry to explain

FORMAT

  • Face to face — not on the couch (unlike classical psychoanalysis)
  • 50 minutes — the standard length of a session
  • 1–2 times a week — typical frequency (less often than in psychoanalysis: 4–5 times)
  • Duration of analysis: from several months to several years

Jung recommended starting at 3–4 times a week and then reducing to 1–2, so that the analysand learns to integrate the work into life

THE ANALYST'S STANCE

✅ The analyst is a real person, not an "empty screen"

✅ Participation in the dialogue, exchange of observations and questions

✅ Countertransference is a valuable instrument, not an obstacle

✅ The analyst's unconscious interacts with the analysand's unconscious

⚠️ Do not hide behind neutrality — be authentic

⚠️ Do not interpret "from above" — inquire together

Jung: "The meeting of two personalities is like the mixing of two chemical substances: if a reaction takes place, both are transformed"

TEMENOS

Temenos — the sacred space of analysis. An analogy with the center of a Greek temple, where the analysand meets the Self.

✅ The analyst's task is to create and guard this space

✅ Safety + freedom for depth work

⚠️ Violating the boundaries of the temenos violates the analytic container

Opening the sessionThe client's material — what they bring today

WHAT THE ANALYSAND BRINGS

"What is on your mind now?"
"What dreams have you had since our last meeting?"
"What has caught your attention these days — events, images, feelings?"

✅ Listen with "evenly suspended attention" (free-floating attention)

✅ Pay attention to affect — a complex stands behind it

TYPES OF MATERIAL

MaterialHow to work
DreamDream analysis: associations, amplification, subjective / objective level
Life situationInquiry into unconscious aspects, complexes, projections
RelationshipsTransference, projections of Anima/Animus, Shadow
Strong affectWhich complex stands behind the affect?
Images, fantasiesActive imagination, symbolic work
Dream analysisThe main method — the dream says what it means

PRINCIPLES

The dream is a direct message of the unconscious (not an "encoded wish", as in Freud)

Compensatory function: the dream compensates for the one-sidedness of consciousness

Prospective function: the dream may point to future development

Series of dreams matter more than single ones — look for patterns, recurring motifs

THE STRUCTURE OF A DREAM (per Jung)

1. Exposition — place, time, characters 2. Development — the unfolding of the plot 3. Culmination — the key event 4. Lysis — the resolution (may be absent)

METHODS OF WORKING WITH A DREAM

Circular associations — we always return to the dream image (unlike Freud's free associations):

"What does this image mean for you personally?"
"When you think about this image — what feelings, memories come?"
"Let's return to this image. What else comes to mind?"

Amplification — expansion of the image through myths, fairy tales, alchemy, culture:

"This image appears in the myth of… / in the fairy tale… / in alchemical symbolism…"

Example: a snake in a dream — personal associations (fear, a memory) + collective amplification (Ouroboros, Kundalini, Asclepius) — transformation, healing, wisdom

TWO LEVELS OF INTERPRETATION

LevelWhat it means
ObjectiveDream figures = real people
SubjectiveDream figures = aspects of the dreamer (Shadow, Anima/Animus, etc.)

✅ Always consider both levels

✅ The subjective level is often the more productive one

"Try keeping a notebook by the bed. Immediately after waking — without moving — write down everything you remember"

✅ Offer work with fantasies, daydreams

✅ The word-association experiment as an alternative

Active imaginationConscious dialogue with the unconscious in a waking state

STAGES

1. Relaxation — a meditative state, lowering of ego activity 2. Passive observation — letting images arise spontaneously 3. Dialogue — entering into active interaction with the image (asking questions, receiving answers) 4. Expression — drawing, painting, sculpting, writing, dance 5. Integration — making sense of the experience in the context of life

SAFETY RULES

⚠️ Do NOT use at the start of analysis — only when the ego is sufficiently strengthened

⚠️ Do NOT use in psychoses or borderline states

⚠️ Do NOT let the ego dissolve into the images — keep your own position

✅ The aim is dialogue between ego and the unconscious, not escape into fantasy

✅ The final aim is to teach the analysand to work with the unconscious on their own

Jung: active imagination is a "replacement" for analysis when analysis has ended

Work with transference and countertransferenceA single relational dynamic — an instrument, not an obstacle

TRANSFERENCE

"What are you feeling toward me right now?"

✅ Transference matters, but it is not the only instrument (unlike Freud)

✅ Positive transference symbolizes the need for a union of the conscious and the unconscious

COUNTERTRANSFERENCE

"What am I feeling in the presence of this analysand?"

✅ Countertransference is an essential instrument for knowing the analysand

✅ The analyst's unconscious responds to the client's unconscious

✅ Trust your feelings as a source of information

⚠️ Do not confuse countertransference with your own unresolved issues — personal analysis is needed

Jung: the analyst can bring the analysand only as far as the analyst themselves has reached

PROJECTIONS

What is projectedWhere
ShadowOnto people who evoke strong dislike
Anima/AnimusOnto partners (falling in love = projection)
SelfOnto the analyst (idealization), onto religious figures
"What in this person irritates you so much? Is there anything in common with what you do not accept in yourself?"
The four stages of the analytic processConfession → Elucidation → Education → Transformation

STAGE 1: CONFESSION (Catharsis)

Speaking out, sharing the secret. The therapeutic meaning of the simple act of telling.

"Tell me what you have told no one"

The very fact that the person shares carries healing

STAGE 2: ELUCIDATION

Work with the transference, uncovering unconscious contents, interpretation.

"Let's look at what stands behind this — what unconscious patterns are at work here?"

STAGE 3: EDUCATION

The move to adaptation: how to apply the insights in real life.

"How can you use what we have discovered in everyday life?"

STAGE 4: TRANSFORMATION

The properly Jungian stage: individuation, meeting with the Self, spiritual transformation.

✅ Requires transformation from the analyst as well

✅ Not every analysis reaches this stage — and that is normal

For many analysands, the first three stages are enough

Between sessionsThe analysand's work in everyday life

RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE ANALYSAND

1. Keep a dream journal — write down dreams immediately after waking 2. Practice active imagination (if the ego is sufficiently strengthened) 3. Pay attention to synchronistic events — meaningful coincidences 4. Draw, sculpt — any forms of creative expression of unconscious images

✅ The goal of analysis is to teach the analysand to work with the unconscious on their own

Jung: "Analysis is not an end in itself. The aim is individuation, which continues through a lifetime"

Dream Analysis / Jungian Dream InterpretationDream Analysis / Jungian Dream Interpretation

The dream is the main diagnostic and therapeutic instrument of Jungian analysis. Jung treated dreams as direct messages of the unconscious with a compensatory function: they correct the one-sidedness of the conscious attitude, bringing what the ego rejects. Each image is explored through personal associations, objective and subjective levels, and amplification. A series of dreams matters more than a single dream.

  • 1. Ask the client to recount the dream without interpretation, in detail, in the present tense ("what is happening in the dream?")
  • 2. Explore each image — "What does this image mean for you personally?" (circular associations: we always return to the image)
  • 3. Define the objective level (figures = real people) and the subjective level (figures = aspects of the dreamer: Shadow, Anima/Animus, etc.)
  • 4. Carry out amplification — expand the image through mythological, cultural, and fairy-tale parallels
  • 5. Connect the message of the dream to the current life situation: what compensation does the unconscious offer?

When to use:

  • The client brings a dream to the session
  • Stagnation in therapy — "What are you dreaming now?"
  • Recurring, disturbing, or vivid dreams
  • Turning points in life, illness, loss, transition
  • Work with a series of dreams (4–8 dreams over a period) — patterns matter more than single dreams

Key phrases:

Tell me the dream as if it is happening right now.

Follow-up questions:

What does this image [animal/person/place] mean for you personally — outside this dream?
If this figure were a part of you — which part?
How does the dream relate to what is happening in your life now?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not impose interpretation — the client must recognize it as their own ("aha reaction")
  • ⚠️ Do not analyze a dream without the client's personal associations, even if the image is "obviously archetypal"
  • ⚠️ Do not ignore affect while the dream is being told — it points to a live complex
  • ⚠️ In work with traumatic dreams — do not rush; first create the safety of the temenos

Jung C.G. CW 8, §§ 440–531; CW 16, §§ 86–102; Man and His Symbols (1964)

AmplificationAmplification

A specifically Jungian method of interpretation — the expansion ("amplification") of an image from a dream or fantasy through parallels drawn from mythology, fairy tales, alchemy, religion, history, and culture. The aim is to show the client that their personal image has a universal, archetypal dimension. Developed by Jung as an alternative to Freudian free association: instead of moving away from the image, we go deeper into it.

  • 1. Fix the concrete image from the dream or fantasy
  • 2. Gather the client's personal associations ("personal amplification")
  • 3. Bring in parallels from collective symbolism: myths, fairy tales, alchemy, religious texts, works of art
  • 4. Compare the personal associations and the collective parallels — look for points of convergence
  • 5. Return the expanded understanding to the client and check: "Does this resonate for you?"

When to use:

  • In dream work — a mandatory method
  • When a dream image feels unclear, empty, or too personal
  • In work with a symptom as a symbol (anxiety = what archetypal pattern?)
  • In work with mandalas, drawings, and creative products
  • When the client is experiencing something "larger than me" — as a tool for making sense

Key phrases:

This image [snake / tower / old man] appears in many cultures. In ancient Greek mythology…

Follow-up questions:

What does [the image] mean for you personally? And if it were a symbol in a fairy tale — what would it mean?
Do you sense that this myth describes something of your situation?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Amplification must not replace the client's personal meaning — it expands, does not substitute
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into a mythology lecture: one or two parallel images are enough
  • ⚠️ The analyst must have broad erudition (mythology, fairy tales, alchemy, religions) for the method to work
  • ⚠️ Always check for resonance: "How is that for you?" Do not impose interpretation

Jung C.G. CW 8, § 403; CW 12, § 403; IAAP, "Amplification"

Active ImaginationActive Imagination

A technique of conscious and deliberate interaction with images of the unconscious in a waking state. Developed by Jung in 1913–1916 as a dialogue between the Ego and the unconscious without an analyst as intermediary. It is a culminating method — used when the analysand is stable enough to meet the unconscious on their own. The result is recorded through writing, drawing, painting, sculpting, or dance.

  • 1. Inviting the image — enter a meditative state, focus on an image from a dream, on an affect, or on a bodily sensation; let the image come alive
  • 2. Passive observation — do not control the image, simply watch its unfolding, registering every detail
  • 3. Active dialogue — enter into contact with the image: ask questions, answer on behalf of the image, argue, interact
  • 4. Expression — record the experience: written dialogue, drawing, painting, sculpture, movement, music
  • 5. Integration and ethical commitment — make sense of the image's message and determine how it affects conscious life; accept a commitment to act in line with the insight

When to use:

  • In the middle or end of analysis (not at the beginning!) — when the Ego is sufficiently stable
  • In stagnation of the analysis, when dream material has run dry
  • For the client's independent work between sessions
  • In work with recurring images / figures from dreams
  • When the client wants to continue an unfinished dream

Key phrases:

Close your eyes and let the image from the dream return. Simply watch what happens.

Follow-up questions:

What will this figure answer if you ask: "What do you want from me?"
What is the image telling you about what needs to change in your real life?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Absolutely contraindicated in psychoses, borderline disorder with an unstable Ego, and acute dissociation
  • ⚠️ Do not use at the start of therapy — it requires a mature Ego
  • ⚠️ The aim is dialogue, not fusion: the Ego must keep its position
  • ⚠️ The method is "not without danger" (Jung, CW 8, § 193) — it can carry one too far from reality
  • ⚠️ Always discuss the experience of active imagination with the analyst

Jung C.G. CW 8, §§ 167–168; CW 14, §§ 749–756; Johnson R. Inner Work (1986)

Word Association Test (WAT)Word Association Test (WAT)

A diagnostic instrument for uncovering emotionally charged complexes through the analysis of disturbances in reactions to stimulus words. Developed by Jung at the Burghölzli in 1903–1906. It predates the polygraph and laid the empirical foundation for the theory of complexes. Indicators of a complex: delayed reaction, repetition of the stimulus word, absence of a response, perseveration, change of answer in the second run.

  • 1. Present the client with 100 stimulus words (Jung's standard list — from mundane to emotionally loaded)
  • 2. Record the first associative response and the reaction time (stopwatch)
  • 3. Carry out a repeat run (the same words after ~20 minutes) — compare with the first
  • 4. Note the indicators of a complex: increased reaction time, repetition of the stimulus word, absence of a response, laughter, bodily reactions, changes of answer on repeat
  • 5. Compile a "map of complexes" and discuss with the client — which themes produced the greatest disturbance

When to use:

  • In the initial stages of analysis — to compile a "map" of personal complexes
  • With unclear symptoms or recurring life patterns
  • When the client struggles to speak about themselves directly (defensive rationalization)
  • In work with somatic symptoms with no obvious cause

Key phrases:

I will say a word, and you say the first thing that comes to mind — without thinking it over.

Follow-up questions:

Did you notice that you reacted differently to that word? What is associated with it?
It seems the theme [X] produces a special response. What stands behind it?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The method is diagnostic, not therapeutic in itself — the results require further work in analysis
  • ⚠️ Do not use it as a "lie detector" — this violates the trust of the temenos
  • ⚠️ The method is rarely used in pure clinical form today; more often the principle of attention to "complex indicators" is applied in free conversation

Jung C.G. CW 2 (Experimental Researches, 1904–1907); Studies in Word Association (1918)

Shadow Work / Shadow IntegrationShadow Work / Shadow Integration

The Shadow is the archetype that contains the repressed, unacknowledged, and socially unacceptable aspects of the personality. It is the first and obligatory stage of individuation. The work includes awareness and integration of these aspects instead of projecting them onto others. The Shadow carries not only "bad" but also unrealized potentials — "gold in the Shadow". The work proceeds through recognition of projections, personification, and dialogue.

  • 1. Recognizing projections — "Who are the people who irritate you most, whom you dislike, whom you envy?" The qualities that outrage us in others are often unacknowledged traits of our own
  • 2. Personifying the Shadow — "Describe a person [or a figure from a dream] who irritates you, in as much detail as possible. What exactly is unbearable in them?"
  • 3. Trying it on — "Is there even the slightest trace of this quality in you? In what situations?"
  • 4. Dialogue (through active imagination) — enter into a conversation with the dark figure from the dream: "What do you want? What do you need from me?"
  • 5. Integration — find a constructive expression for the Shadow's energy; understand that this part carries valuable potential

When to use:

  • Intense negative projections onto other people (partner, colleagues, politicians)
  • Recurring dark figures in dreams — persecutors, enemies, "villains"
  • Denial of one's own "bad" qualities in the face of obvious behavior
  • Excessive self-idealization (an inflated Persona)
  • Sudden flashes of anger, envy, destructive behavior "out of character"

Key phrases:

Who, among the people you know, makes you lose your temper most? Describe in detail what exactly.

Follow-up questions:

If this trait [that you hate in them] were in you — how would it show up?
This figure pursues you in dreams. What will happen if you stop and ask them: "What do you want?"

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Work with the Shadow produces anxiety and resistance — the pace is set by the client's readiness
  • ⚠️ Too fast an integration can destabilize the psyche
  • ⚠️ Distinguish the personal Shadow (individual) from the collective Shadow (cultural / archetypal aspects)
  • ⚠️ Do not confuse Shadow integration with "permitting bad behavior" — it is a work of awareness

Jung C.G. CW 9i, §§ 13–19; CW 9ii, §§ 13–19; CW 7, §§ 103–109

Anima/Animus WorkAnima/Animus Work

Anima is the archetype of the unconscious feminine in the male psyche; Animus is the archetype of the unconscious masculine in the female psyche. It is the second stage of individuation, after the integration of the Shadow. Unconscious Anima / Animus are projected onto partners, producing idealization or sharp disappointments. Recognizing them as inner figures frees energy from projection and develops inner dialogue.

  • 1. Explore patterns of projection onto partners: "What drew you to / repelled you in this person so strongly? In what words would you describe their ideal / terrible image?"
  • 2. Identify archetypal traits: "Does this description resemble any mythological figure?"
  • 3. Pose the "withdrawal of projection" question: "If these qualities are not in him / her, but in you — how would they look?"
  • 4. Personify through active imagination: enter into dialogue with the inner figure of Anima / Animus
  • 5. Develop the contrasexual principle in real life (for the man — the feeling side; for the woman — firmness and independence of judgment)

When to use:

  • Intense "magical" infatuations or sharp disappointments with partners
  • A recurring pattern of relationships ("I always choose the same")
  • Dreams with unfamiliar attractive / frightening figures of the opposite sex
  • A man with uncontrollable mood swings (captured by the Anima)
  • A woman with a destructive inner critic voice (captured by a negative Animus)

Key phrases:

Describe this person [partner] in as much detail as you can. What captivated you so much?

Follow-up questions:

If this were an image from a dream — how would you name it?
What quality do you look for in a partner and do not find in yourself?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Withdrawing projections is a painful process: the client may resist and blame the analyst
  • ⚠️ You cannot force it — the client must be ready for the idea that the "object of love" is their inner figure
  • ⚠️ Distinguish the integration of Anima / Animus from the refusal of relationships: the goal is more mature relationships, not isolation

Jung C.G. CW 9i, §§ 111–147; CW 7, §§ 296–340; Emma Jung, Animus and Anima (1957)

Sandplay Therapy (Jungian Sandplay)Sandplay Therapy (Jungian Sandplay)

A non-verbal therapy method created by Dora Kalff on the basis of Jungian theory, Margaret Lowenfeld's "World Technique", and Buddhist philosophy. The client creates a three-dimensional scene from miniature figures in a sand tray in a "free and protected space". It gives access to preverbal, somatic, and archetypal layers of the unconscious. What matters is the process of the series, not a single scene.

  • 1. Create a "free and protected space" — silent presence of the therapist without interpretation or instructions
  • 2. Invite the client to create a scene in the tray (60×72 cm, blue bottom — water/sky) using miniature figures
  • 3. The therapist observes the process of creation — does not intervene, does not comment
  • 4. After the creation — photograph the scene; if the client wishes, they may describe it
  • 5. Interpret only in the context of a series — a single scene is not interpreted; what matters is the process over time
  • 6. With adults — some time later discuss what they "placed" into the scene

When to use:

  • Clients who find it hard to speak (trauma, alexithymia, children)
  • Preverbal and early trauma
  • Work with images that "do not translate into words"
  • Psychosomatics — symptoms without an obvious psychological cause
  • Acute crisis states (as a stabilizing method through the "hands")
  • Stagnation in verbal work — when words "go in circles"

Key phrases:

Take whatever catches your attention and create something in this sand — anything you like.

Follow-up questions:

Tell me about this scene, if you wish.
What is happening in this world?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Requires specialized training (Sandplay Therapists of America, ISST)
  • ⚠️ Absolutely do not interpret the scene aloud while it is being created — it destroys the "free space"
  • ⚠️ Do not use as "play therapy" without the theoretical grounding
  • ⚠️ Countertransference is strong: the therapist may react intensely to heavy scenes (chaos, violence, death)

Kalff D. Sandplay: A Psychotherapeutic Approach to the Psyche (1966/1980); PMC (2024)

Persona Work / Persona DissolutionPersona Work / Persona Dissolution

The Persona is the "mask", the social face of the person, the archetype of adaptation to societal expectations. The pathology is identification with the Persona (the person no longer distinguishes themselves from the role). Persona work is the awareness of the gap between the public "I" and the deeper "I", the dissolution of excessive identification with the social role. Especially relevant in midlife crisis, burnout, and imposter syndrome.

  • 1. Explore how the client "presents themselves" in different contexts (work, family, friendship)
  • 2. Find the mismatches: "Who do you become when you put on [the role of the doctor / the father / the successful person]? What gets hidden?"
  • 3. Trace the cost of the Persona: fatigue, a sense of emptiness, the inability to be oneself
  • 4. Pose the question: "Who are you when no one sees you?"
  • 5. Gradually explore what lies behind the Persona — which feelings, wishes, fears it covers

When to use:

  • The client is "successful on the outside, empty on the inside" — existential emptiness with external wellbeing
  • Imposter syndrome — the gap between "how I am seen" and "who I am"
  • Burnout — the person has exhausted themselves in the role
  • Midlife crisis — the role no longer works
  • Narcissistic patterns — when the self-image is rigidly controlled

Key phrases:

How would you describe yourself if no one were judging you?

Follow-up questions:

What do you never show at work / in the family? Why?
Behind this role [of the successful / strong / good one] — what is hidden?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Dissolution of the Persona without support can produce deep disorientation and depression
  • ⚠️ Do not rush — the Persona protects vulnerable parts of the personality
  • ⚠️ In work with depression in "successful" clients, the Persona is often the sole source of meaning; remove it carefully

Jung C.G. CW 7, §§ 243–269 (The Relations Between the Ego and the Unconscious)

Transcendent Function / Holding the Tension of OppositesTranscendent Function / Holding the Tension of Opposites

The transcendent function is the capacity of the psyche to create symbols that unite the opposing contents of the conscious and the unconscious. Described by Jung in 1916. Therapeutically — a method of holding the tension between opposing attitudes without an immediate "solution", which allows a third, new symbol or path to arise. A foundational principle of all analytical psychology.

  • 1. Identify the polarity: two opposing forces, wishes, values in conflict ("I want to leave — and I want to stay")
  • 2. Give each side a voice — without choosing, without an immediate decision
  • 3. Hold the tension — stay in uncertainty, without falling to one side
  • 4. Wait and observe — what symbol, image, idea, or action spontaneously arises out of this tension?
  • 5. Explore the arising symbol as a "message from the Self" — a third way, not obvious to either side of the conflict

When to use:

  • The client is stuck in an irresolvable inner conflict ("I can neither this way nor that")
  • Existential decisions in which there is no "right" answer
  • Work with contradictory feelings toward the same person
  • Creative crises, a professional crossroads
  • Later stages of analysis — as a main method of work with individuation

Key phrases:

So, one part of you wants X, and another — Y. What happens if you simply hold both of these desires, without choosing?

Follow-up questions:

Try not to decide right now. What appears in the space between these two positions?
When you hold this tension — what arises of itself? An image, an impulse, a word?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Holding the tension of opposites is painful; not all clients can do it
  • ⚠️ Do not confuse it with avoidance of a decision — the transcendent function leads to a new path, not to inaction
  • ⚠️ The analyst themselves must be able to "hold" the tension, otherwise they will "solve" for the client prematurely

Jung C.G. CW 8, §§ 131–193 (The Transcendent Function, 1916/1958)

Complex Work / Working with Feeling-Toned ComplexesComplex Work / Working with Feeling-Toned Complexes

A complex is an emotionally charged group of images and ideas organized around an archetypal core and personal experience. When a complex is activated, it "captures" the Ego — the person speaks and acts "from the complex" rather than from themselves. The aim of the work is to become aware of the complex, give it a voice, and integrate its energy. A complex cannot be eliminated; what can change is the relationship to it.

  • 1. Notice the capture by the complex — intense affect, a reaction "out of proportion" to the situation, the feeling of "this again"
  • 2. Name the complex: "It sounds like it is not the 'adult you' speaking, but something else. What is that voice?"
  • 3. Personify — give the complex an image, a voice, a name (mother, father, critic, child)
  • 4. Explore the archetypal core: "What archetypal pattern (Great Mother, Father, Hero, Victim…) stands behind this?"
  • 5. Dialogue with the complex — through active imagination: "What do you want? What do you need from me?"
  • 6. Gradual integration — changing the relationship to the complex from fusion to conscious interaction

When to use:

  • Uncontrollable affective reactions (anger, horror, shame, "I don't understand why I react like this")
  • Recurring destructive patterns ("I always end up in the same situations")
  • The sense of being "split" — "one part of me wants X, another is completely against it"
  • Sharp reactions to particular people (transference) — "they evoke something in me that is not real"

Key phrases:

This is a very strong reaction. Is it familiar? When else have you felt this?

Follow-up questions:

Whose voice is it — the one saying to you [the client's exact phrase]?
If this voice / this feeling were a person — what would they look like?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ You cannot "eliminate" a complex — you can only become aware of it and change your relationship to it
  • ⚠️ Strong activation of a complex in session is therapeutically valuable, but requires grounding at the end
  • ⚠️ Distinguish: "the client speaking from the complex" (capture) and "the client speaking about the complex" (awareness)

Jung C.G. CW 2; CW 8, §§ 200–219 (A Review of the Complex Theory); CW 9i

Alchemical Symbolism / Alchemical Imagery in AnalysisAlchemical Symbolism / Alchemical Imagery in Analysis

Jung discovered that medieval alchemy is a projection of psychic processes. The stages of the alchemical process (nigredo, albedo, citrinitas, rubedo) are used as metaphors for stages of psychic transformation. Nigredo — "the blackening", disintegration, depression; albedo — purification; rubedo — integration, the incarnation of the Self. The method consists in recognizing alchemical images in the client's material and using them therapeutically.

  • 1. Recognize in the client's material (dreams, drawings, symptoms) images corresponding to alchemical stages
  • 2. Amplify the image through the alchemical context: "In medieval alchemy 'dissolution' meant…"
  • 3. Use the nigredo stage to normalize depression and chaos: "This is an important stage of transformation, not an end"
  • 4. Track the dynamics of the stages — is the client "moving" through the opus? Where are they now?
  • 5. Use the image of coniunctio (the union of opposites) as a symbol of individuation

When to use:

  • The client is going through "disintegration" — depression, identity crisis, loss of meaning (nigredo as orientation)
  • Work with the creative process — artists, scientists, writers
  • Later stages of analysis — the coniunctio image, the union of opposites
  • A client with an interest in the symbolic — "it's like the myth of…"

Key phrases:

What you are describing — the feeling of falling apart, of darkness — is what alchemy called nigredo. It is not the end, it is the beginning of transformation.

Follow-up questions:

In this image [from the dream] there is something that resembles the alchemical symbol of dissolution…

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Alchemical imagery is an extremely complex system; without deep study of CW 12 and CW 14 it cannot be applied
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into an "educational lecture" — the client must recognize their own experience
  • ⚠️ The method requires considerable clinical and theoretical maturity in the analyst

Jung C.G. CW 12 (Psychology and Alchemy, 1944); CW 14 (Mysterium Coniunctionis, 1955–1956); von Franz M.-L. Alchemical Active Imagination (1979)

Fairy Tale Analysis / Amplification Through Fairy TalesFairy Tale Analysis / Amplification Through Fairy Tales

M.-L. von Franz developed a method of interpreting fairy tales as "the purest expression of the collective unconscious". Fairy-tale characters are interpreted as archetypal parts of the psyche: the hero = the Ego, the dark character = the Shadow, the magical helper = the Self. In clinical practice — the use of fairy-tale images as an instrument of amplification and for understanding archetypal patterns in the client's life.

  • 1. Find a fairy-tale motif matching the client's situation ("your story resembles the tale of…")
  • 2. Tell or recall the tale in detail
  • 3. Analyze the symbolic characters as archetypal parts of the psyche: hero = Ego, dark character = Shadow / Animus / negative Mother, magical helper = Self
  • 4. Explore the hero's "mistake" (often the first action) as a projection of the client's "wrong attitude of consciousness"
  • 5. Discuss the end of the tale — how the collective unconscious "offers" a resolution of the situation

When to use:

  • The client describes their life in archetypal patterns ("I always save others", "I am always betrayed")
  • Work with recurring life scenarios
  • Clients with an interest in symbolic, literary, mythological thinking
  • Work with children and adolescents — directly
  • When direct interpretations meet resistance — the fairy tale as a "detour"

Key phrases:

This story you are telling reminds me of a fairy tale…

Follow-up questions:

In this tale the hero does what you are doing — what happens next?
What in this tale touches you most? Which character is close to you?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The method requires a broad knowledge of fairy-tale material (European, Eastern, world tales)
  • ⚠️ Do not make "direct" translations of the images into psychological concepts — let the image speak for itself
  • ⚠️ Distinguish therapeutic use of fairy-tale images from literal interpretation

Von Franz M.-L. The Interpretation of Fairy Tales (1970/1996); Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales (1974); Individuation in Fairy Tales (1977)

Working with SynchronicityWorking with Synchronicity

Synchronicity — "an acausal connecting principle" (Jung, 1952): meaningful coincidences between external events and inner psychic states. In clinical practice — a special attention to "meaningful coincidences" as possible messages of the unconscious or of the Self. The criterion of a synchronistic event: the intensity of the psychic state and the meaningful parallel with the external event.

  • 1. Listen to the "strange coincidence" without skepticism and without magical explanation
  • 2. Explore the psychic state at the moment of the coincidence: "What were you feeling / thinking just before this?"
  • 3. Find a parallel between inner state and outer event: what message does this coincidence carry?
  • 4. Link the synchronistic experience with the current theme of the analysis
  • 5. Do not explain or prove — inquire phenomenologically: "What does this event tell you?"

When to use:

  • The client comes with an "inexplicable coincidence" that has shaken them
  • At turning points (a hard decision, loss, new beginning)
  • As an orientation in analysis — "what has brought you precisely to this theme today?"
  • In work with meaning and the numinous

Key phrases:

What were you feeling or thinking just before this event?

Follow-up questions:

What does this coincidence tell you? What does it "want" to communicate?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not interpret as "magic" or "signs of fate" in the literal sense
  • ⚠️ Do not overvalue — not every coincidence is synchronistic; the criterion is the intensity of the psychic state and the meaningful parallel
  • ⚠️ A client with schizotypal features may pathologically amplify synchronistic thinking — be careful

Jung C.G. CW 8, §§ 816–968 (Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, 1952); joint work with W. Pauli (1952)

Analysis of the Transference (Symbolic) / Jungian Transference WorkAnalysis of the Transference (Symbolic) / Jungian Transference Work

Jung saw transference and countertransference as a single dynamic of the analytic relationship with therapeutic potential. Transference is the projection of inner figures (Anima / Animus, Shadow, Self) onto the analyst. Countertransference is the mirror of the client's unconscious in the analyst's psyche. In The Psychology of the Transference (1944) Jung used alchemical images of coniunctio to describe the dynamics of the therapeutic relationship.

  • 1. Notice your own reactions as the analyst — what the client is "putting into" the relationship (idealization, fear, anger, erotic attraction)
  • 2. Hold the transference, without rejecting or encouraging it — preserve the temenos
  • 3. Explore which inner figure is projected onto the analyst: "Who do I seem to you in these moments? Who does it resemble?"
  • 4. Use countertransference as a diagnostic instrument — what does the analyst feel toward the client?
  • 5. Interpret the symbolic dimension of the transference: "This is not simply about me. It is about the image [of the father / mother / savior] that lives inside you"
  • 6. Work toward the resolution of the transference — withdrawing projections, developing inner objects

When to use:

  • Intense emotional reactions of the client toward the therapist (idealization, devaluation, anger)
  • The analyst notices unusual reactions in themselves to the client — use as information
  • Stagnation in the work — often tied to unprocessed transference
  • Eroticized transference — must be explored symbolically at once

Key phrases:

When you think about me [or: when you are angry with me], who does that resemble in your life?

Follow-up questions:

I notice that something in our relationship has changed. What do you think about that?
Your feelings toward me are important material for our work. Tell me about them.

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The Jungian analyst is not a "blank screen" — they are present as a real person, but the symbolic dimension of the transference is always explored
  • ⚠️ Countertransference is an instrument, but can also mislead; regular supervision is mandatory
  • ⚠️ Boundary violations in the transference (especially the erotic) are an ethical violation; a clear understanding of the temenos is required

Jung C.G. CW 16, §§ 353–539 (The Psychology of the Transference, 1944); IAAP, Transference and Countertransference

Mandala Drawing / Painting the Unconscious / Expressive Arts in Jungian AnalysisMandala Drawing / Painting the Unconscious / Expressive Arts in Jungian Analysis

Jung himself drew mandalas daily in 1916–1919, considering them "cryptograms" of the state of the psyche. A mandala (Sanskrit "circle") is a symbol of the Self, of wholeness, of the center. Any spontaneous visual creativity is a non-verbal path to the unconscious. The approach includes drawing, sculpting, movement (Authentic Movement), writing. A series of mandalas reflects the dynamics of the state of the psyche.

  • 1. Invite the client to draw or sculpt "what comes" — without an artistic task, without judging quality
  • 2. The therapist observes without commenting during the creation
  • 3. Afterwards: "Tell me about this image. What in it surprises you?"
  • 4. Explore the image through personal associations and, if needed, collective amplification
  • 5. For mandalas — track the series: centeredness / chaos, color, symmetry as indicators of the state of the psyche

When to use:

  • The client cannot / does not want to speak in words — the drawing as the "draft of the unconscious"
  • Work with bodily symptoms — "draw where the pain lives"
  • Acute states — drawing as grounding and containment
  • Between sessions — the client keeps a "visual diary"
  • In work with numinous experience, dreams, active imagination — fixing of images

Key phrases:

Take a sheet and draw what comes — no plan, whatever it is.

Follow-up questions:

What is this figure / this color saying to you?
Where is the center of this drawing? Where is the disorder? What does that say about your state?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Never evaluate the artistic quality of the work
  • ⚠️ Do not rush into interpretation — allow the image to "speak for itself"
  • ⚠️ Powerful images (death, dismemberment, chaos) may frighten the client — safety must be maintained

Jung C.G. CW 9i, §§ 627–712 (Concerning Mandala Symbolism); Memories, Dreams, Reflections (1962); Whitehouse M. (1963) — Authentic Movement

Working with Archetypal Figures / PersonificationWorking with Archetypal Figures / Personification

Archetypal figures (the Wise Old Man, the Great Mother, the Hero, the Trickster, Puer Aeternus, Kore/the Maiden, and others) are universal images of the collective unconscious. They appear in dreams, fantasies, and life patterns. The work is to personify them, enter into dialogue, understand the message, and limit their autonomy through awareness. The danger is archetypal inflation (identification with the archetype instead of dialogue).

  • 1. Identify the archetypal figure in the client's material — a dream, a life pattern, a symptom
  • 2. Amplify through mythology: "This image [of the Wise Old Man / Trickster] appears in…"
  • 3. Explore how the client is "identified" with this archetype or "possessed" by it
  • 4. Offer dialogue through active imagination
  • 5. Help differentiate the Ego from the archetype — "this is a part of you, but not the whole of you"

When to use:

  • Puer Aeternus syndrome — the "eternal youth" who cannot take up reality
  • "Capture" by the negative Mother — depression, the sense of being swallowed
  • A client in the role of a "rescuer" — capture by the Hero / Messiah archetype
  • Grandiosity (inflation by an archetype) — the person has "become" the archetype instead of being in dialogue with it

Key phrases:

This Old Man [the figure from the dream] — what does he want to tell you?

Follow-up questions:

You say that you cannot stop, begin, risk. This resembles the image of the Puer. What is linked to this image?
How would a Wise Old Man / Wise Old Woman look at this situation?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Archetypal inflation (the person identified with the archetype) is a serious state that requires careful work with the boundaries of the Ego
  • ⚠️ Do not romanticize the archetypes — each carries a light and a dark side
  • ⚠️ In work with the Great Mother archetype — with traumatized clients a strong regression may be activated

Jung C.G. CW 9i, §§ 1–86; CW 7, §§ 269–295; von Franz M.-L. Puer Aeternus (1970); Hillman J. Re-Visioning Psychology (1975)

Working with the Self-Care System (Kalsched) / Archetypal Defenses of the Personal SpiritWorking with the Self-Care System (Kalsched) / Archetypal Defenses of the Personal Spirit

Donald Kalsched extended the Jungian approach to work with early childhood trauma. His concept of the "self-care system" — archetypal psychic structures that arise in response to unbearable trauma in order to protect the "personal spirit" (the innocent core of the personality). The system protects, but at the same time obstructs healing, creating persecuting / protecting inner figures.

  • 1. Recognize the self-care system in the material — persecuting figures in dreams, inner critic, self-destructive patterns at the approach of closeness
  • 2. Normalize: "This system once saved you. It was necessary."
  • 3. Differentiate the defending and persecuting sides of the system: "Which part of you defends, and which attacks?"
  • 4. Create a sufficiently safe temenos so that the "personal spirit" can begin to appear
  • 5. Work with images of the system through active imagination — gradually, without forcing the defenses
  • 6. Track countertransference — work with severe trauma produces intense countertransference in the therapist

When to use:

  • Clients with early trauma (abuse, neglect, childhood loss)
  • Dissociation — "parts of the personality" that act autonomously
  • A pattern: "only when I begin to heal — something destroys it from within"
  • Intense persecuting figures in dreams
  • The client seems "not present", withdrawn — at moments of closeness

Key phrases:

What happens inside when you begin to feel better?

Follow-up questions:

This part that attacks you — it once defended you. How exactly?
What would be too dangerous if you allowed yourself to feel this?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Work with severe trauma requires specialized training (trauma therapy + Jungian analysis)
  • ⚠️ Pace is critical — forcing destroys fragile trust and activates the self-care system
  • ⚠️ Regular supervision is mandatory: intense countertransference is inevitable
  • ⚠️ Distinguish work with complexes from work with a dissociative structure in severe trauma

Kalsched D. The Inner World of Trauma (1996); Trauma and the Soul (2013)

Image Work / Archetypal Psychology (Hillman) / Soul-MakingImage Work / Archetypal Psychology (Hillman) / Soul-Making

James Hillman developed "archetypal psychology", radically focusing therapy on images as a reality in themselves. His principle: the image does not symbolize something else — it is what it is. The task is not to interpret the image but to deepen it, to "live with it", to ask questions in its own language. "Soul-making" — the process of deepening the psyche through images rather than reducing them to explanatory concepts.

  • 1. Accept the image from the dream without immediate interpretation — "what is this image doing?"
  • 2. Ask phenomenological questions: "What does this image want? What matters to it?"
  • 3. Do not reduce: do not "translate" the image into psychological concepts ("the black dog = depression")
  • 4. Deepen the image: explore its details, its "point of view", its "needs"
  • 5. Allow multiplicity — in the psyche there is no single center; there are many voices and images, each with equal standing

When to use:

  • Work with dream images when the "standard" interpretation feels superficial
  • A client with a rich imagination who is tired of "explanations"
  • Work with the symptom as a "character" — "if your anxiety were a character, who would they be?"
  • Existential questions not yielding to interpretation

Key phrases:

Not what this image means, but — what is it doing? What does it need?

Follow-up questions:

If you did not explain this black dog, but simply were with it — what would happen?
What is this character's point of view? What matters to them?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Hillman's approach opposes interpretative traditions — it can provoke resistance in clients used to "explanations"
  • ⚠️ Requires high tolerance for uncertainty in the therapist
  • ⚠️ Not suitable as the sole method in acute symptomatology, where more structured work is needed

Hillman J. Re-Visioning Psychology (1975); The Dream and the Underworld (1979); A Blue Fire: Selected Writings (1989)

ALLIANCE

FOCUS

INTERVENTIONS

PRESENCE

CLOSING

🔧 Adapted diary
This approach does not define a standardized client diary. We prepared an adapted version based on its key concepts. If you have suggestions, write to us.
Symbols Diary

Jungian therapy works with symbols, dreams, and archetypes.

By recording images and associations, you build a bridge to the unconscious.

Record the image or dream → associations → feeling → possible meaning.

Materials are informational and educational and summarize publicly available scientific sources. They are not medical or psychological advice, are not intended for self-diagnosis or self-treatment, and do not replace consultation with a qualified professional.