← Library

Adler's Individual Psychology

Adlerian
«What matters is not what you were born with, but what you do with it.»
Definition

Alfred Adler (1870–1937)

Founder(s) and history

Individual psychology was born out of the break with Freud. Adler did not accept the idea of sexuality as the driving force — he saw something else: a human being strives not toward pleasure but toward overcoming, toward belonging, toward significance. That shift changed the whole of psychotherapy.

Key concepts

Alfred Adler (1870–1937)

Alfred Adler was born in Vienna into a middle-class family. He was a sickly child — rickets, pneumonia, twice near death. He saw his older brother surpass him physically. These experiences became not a trauma but a source: precisely out of his own experience of inferiority, Adler grew an entire psychological system.

Adler trained in medicine at the University of Vienna, started as an ophthalmologist, then moved to general practice. In 1902 Freud invited him into his circle — the Wednesday Psychological Society. Adler accepted the invitation but kept his independence of thought from the very beginning.

By 1911 the disagreements had become irreconcilable. Adler did not accept the dominance of the sexual drive and insisted on the social nature of the human being and on the creative power of the personality. He left Freud and founded the Society for Free Psychoanalytic Inquiry, soon renamed the Society for Individual Psychology.

The word "individual" (from Latin individuus — indivisible) means not "about a separate person" but "about the indivisibility of the personality". Adler saw the human being as a whole — you cannot separate body from psyche, thought from feeling, personality from society.

From Freud to Adler

Where Freud looked backward — into childhood, into trauma, into unconscious drives — Adler looked forward. He was interested not in where the person came from but in where they are heading. Not in the causes of behavior but in its goals.

Freud described the human being as a battlefield among the It, the I, and the Super-I. Adler saw a unified, purposeful personality who actively creates their own life. Not a victim of drives, but the creator of their style of life.

It was a revolutionary shift:

  • From causal thinking (why?) to teleological thinking (for what?)
  • From intrapsychic (inner conflict) to social (place in the community)
  • From determinism (the past determines) to freedom of choice (the person decides)

Adler was decades ahead of his time. Humanistic psychology, CBT, positive psychology, coaching — they all stand on the foundation Adler laid, though they do not always acknowledge it.

Key concepts

Sense of inferiority and compensation

Every child is born small, weak, and dependent in a world of large, strong, and independent adults. This is the universal sense of inferiority — not pathology, but the starting position. It launches the striving to overcome.

  • Compensation — the healthy response: I am weak in this → I become stronger, or I find another path
  • Overcompensation — turning a weakness into an exceptional strength (Demosthenes and stammering)
  • Inferiority complex — fixation: I am forever inadequate, there is no point in trying
  • Superiority complex — masking inferiority through displays of greatness

Adler stressed: inferiority is the engine of development. The problem begins when the feeling of inferiority turns into the belief of inferiority.

Style of life (Lebensstil)

The style of life is a holistic pattern formed by the age of 5-6 that determines how a person perceives the self, others, and the world. It is not a set of habits but a unified strategy that runs through everything — from the choice of profession to the way of quarreling.

The style of life includes:

  • Self-image — "who am I?" (strong/weak, capable/defective)
  • Image of the world — "what is the world like?" (safe/dangerous, fair/hostile)
  • Ethical conviction — "what is right?" (cooperate/compete)
  • Fictional finalism — the unconscious goal toward which everything aims

Fictional finalism

Adler borrowed from the philosopher Hans Vaihinger the idea of "fictions" — convictions that are not true but are useful for orientation. Every person has an unconscious final goal — a fictional finale — that they strive toward.

Examples of fictional goals:

  • "When I become perfect, I will be loved"
  • "When I control everything, I will be safe"
  • "When everyone sees I was right, I will find peace"

A fictional goal is not a conscious intention. It is an unconscious orientation that organizes the whole style of life. Therapy helps us see this goal and ask whether it serves the person.

Social interest (Gemeinschaftsgefühl)

The central concept of the mature Adler. Social interest is an innate potential that needs to be developed. It is:

  • A sense of belonging to the human community
  • Readiness to contribute, not only to consume
  • The capacity to see the world through another's eyes
  • The courage to be imperfect and still take part
High social interestLow social interest
CooperationCompetition
ContributionConsumption
Courage to be imperfectStriving for superiority
EmpathyEgocentrism
BelongingIsolation

Adler considered social interest the main criterion of psychological health. Every neurotic strategy is an attempt to solve the problem of belonging and significance by a mistaken route.

Three life tasks

Adler defined three tasks that every person must solve:

  • Work (Arbeit) — useful contribution to society
  • Friendship (Freundschaft) — equal relations with others
  • Love (Liebe) — intimate closeness, partnership

For Adler, neurosis is an evasion of one or several life tasks. The symptom "protects" from confronting the task and at the same time provides an "alibi": I cannot, because I am ill.

Birth order

Adler was the first to systematically describe the influence of the child's psychological position in the family. What matters: not the biological fact, but the subjective experience.

  • Firstborn: experienced "dethronement" when the second child arrived. Often responsible, conservative, rule-oriented
  • Second: grows up in the "shadow" of the older one, often competes or chooses the opposite path
  • Youngest: the smallest, can be ambitious or helpless
  • Only child: the center of the family universe, may be mature or dependent on attention

Indications

Most effective for:

  • Adjustment disorders and life crises
  • Problems of self-esteem, perfectionism, procrastination
  • Behavior problems in children and adolescents
  • Relationship problems — couples, families
  • Depression, anxiety disorders (mild and moderate)
  • Personality disorders (as long-term therapy)

Format:

  • Individual therapy: 12–30 sessions (short-term) or open-ended
  • Group therapy: educational groups, support groups
  • Family counseling: work with parenting strategies
  • School counseling: the Adlerian model is widely used in education

Development after Adler

Rudolf Dreikurs (1897–1972)

Adler's closest pupil, who emigrated to Chicago. Dreikurs systematized and popularized Adlerian therapy in America. His main contribution — the description of four goals of mistaken behavior (attention, power, revenge, display of inadequacy) — and the application of Adlerian ideas in parenting and education.

Dreikurs's book Children: The Challenge became a classic of parenting literature and made the Adlerian approach accessible to millions of families.

Heinz Ansbacher (1904–2006)

Editor and systematizer of Adler's legacy. Together with his wife Rowena he created a fundamental anthology of Adler's writings, making dispersed texts accessible to researchers. Ansbacher showed that Adler's ideas anticipated humanistic psychology, cognitive therapy, and systems theory.

Donald Dinkmeyer (1924–2001)

Developed the STEP (Systematic Training for Effective Parenting) programs — systematic training for parents based on Adlerian principles. STEP became one of the most widely used parenting-education programs in the world.

Influence on other schools

Adler exerted a deep — though often unacknowledged — influence on all subsequent psychotherapy:

  • Abraham Maslow recognized Adler as a forerunner of humanistic psychology
  • Albert Ellis called Adler the first cognitive therapist
  • Viktor Frankl was Adler's student and developed his idea of purposefulness into logotherapy
  • Carl Rogers shared the Adlerian faith in the client's resources
  • Harold Mosak developed the concept of the style of life and created a modern system of lifestyle assessment
  • Modern coaching is largely built on Adlerian principles: goal orientation, encouragement, responsibility, action

Ellenberger, in The Discovery of the Unconscious, wrote: Adler is one of the most influential and least recognized psychologists of the 20th century. His ideas have become so woven into everyday life that people stop connecting them with his name.

Therapy format

Individual psychology was born out of the break with Freud. Adler did not accept the idea of sexuality as the driving force — he saw something else: a human being strives not toward pleasure but toward overcoming, toward belonging, toward significance. That shift changed the whole of psychotherapy.

By 1911 the disagreements had become irreconcilable. Adler did not accept the dominance of the sexual drive and insisted on the social nature of the human being and on the creative power of the personality. He left Freud and founded the Society for Free Psychoanalytic Inquiry, soon renamed the Society for Individual Psychology.

The word "individual" (from Latin individuus — indivisible) means not "about a separate person" but "about the indivisibility of the personality". Adler saw the human being as a whole — you cannot separate body from psyche, thought from feeling, personality from society.

  • Individual therapy: 12–30 sessions (short-term) or open-ended

Rudolf Dreikurs (1897–1972)

Adler's closest pupil, who emigrated to Chicago. Dreikurs systematized and popularized Adlerian therapy in America. His main contribution — the description of four goals of mistaken behavior (attention, power, revenge, display of inadequacy) — and the application of Adlerian ideas in parenting and education.

Evidence base

EFFECTIVENESS

Adlerian therapy has a long clinical history, although fewer randomized controlled trials (RCTs) than CBT. Still, research supports the effectiveness of its key components:

  • Meta-analysis by Watts & Pietrzak: encouragement as a therapeutic factor significantly reduces anxiety and depression (d = 0.60–0.80)
  • Research by Sweeney: Adlerian therapy is effective for behavior problems in children and adolescents, comparable to CBT
  • Kern et al.: the Lifestyle Assessment shows good construct validity and test-retest reliability
  • Early-recollection research: patterns of early recollections correlate with current personality traits and clinical profiles

Many of Adler's concepts have been confirmed under other names: "attributional style" in cognitive psychology, "internal working models of attachment" in attachment theory, "schemas" in schema therapy — all are variations of the "style of life".

Limitations
  • Limited evidence base — the number of RCTs is below that of cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Acute states — in psychosis, active suicidality, or severe addiction, stabilization is required before therapy begins
  • Demands on therapist training — the quality of the work depends on training and supervision
  • Cultural adaptation — the approach requires adaptation to the client's cultural context
The Adlerian stanceEquality, respect, faith in the client's resources

You are working with a whole person — not with a symptom, not with a trauma, but with a human being who has built a style of life in response to the felt sense of inferiority. Your task is not to fix, but to understand the logic of that style and help the client see that they have a choice.

"What matters is not what a person is born with, but what they do with it." — Alfred Adler

An Adlerian session is the cooperation of two equals. You are not the expert who hands out a diagnosis. You are a partner exploring together with the client their private logic — the system of beliefs they built in childhood and carry through life without being aware of it.

The main instrument is encouragement. Not praise for a result, but the recognition of effort, courage, movement. A discouraged client cannot change — encouragement returns their faith in their own strength and in their belonging to the community.

Adler insisted: therapist and client sit face to face, on the same level. This is not a detail of furniture but a philosophy of relationship. You are not higher, not wiser, not healthier — you are with the client in their inquiry.

DEMOCRATIC RELATIONS

In Adlerian therapy there is no "patient". There is a human being who came to make sense of their life. Your position:

  • Equality — no hierarchy, no authoritativeness, no expertise from above
  • Respect — for the client's choices, even mistaken ones (they made sense at some point)
  • Faith — the client is capable of changing; they have resources
  • Interest — sincere, warm, without distance

✅ An Adlerian therapist can be open, use humor, share observations — this is a relationship, not a ritual

⚠️ Do not confuse equality with the absence of structure. You lead the process, set the frame, offer direction — but you do not impose

FOUR PHASES OF ADLERIAN THERAPY

Adler and his followers described therapy as a four-phase process. The phases are not rigid — they flow into one another, and you can return to earlier ones.

PhaseContentFocus
1. RelationshipBuilding contact and allianceSafety, trust
2. InvestigationLifestyle, early recollections, family constellationUnderstanding the pattern
3. InsightAwareness of private logic, its goals and consequencesLink between past and present
4. ReorientationNew choices, behavior, social interestChange
Building the relationshipSafety through equality, not through distance

The first phase is the foundation of everything. Without genuine contact, Adlerian therapy is not possible. The client must feel that before them is a person who is interested in them as a personality — not in their symptoms.

FIRST CONTACT

Start with a simple, warm invitation to speak about themselves:

"Tell me what brought you here."
"How would you describe your situation?"

Listen not only to the content but to how the client describes themselves:

  • As a victim of circumstances?
  • As the one to blame for everything?
  • As helpless?
  • As a fighter who has no luck?

These are the first clues about the style of life. Do not interpret yet — just notice.

THE QUESTION (ADLER'S QUESTION)

One of Adler's most famous diagnostic tools. It helps distinguish an organic problem from a psychogenic one, but more importantly — it clarifies which life task the client is avoiding.

"If I could wave a magic wand and your symptom disappeared tomorrow morning — what would change in your life? What would you do differently?"
"Imagine the problem is gone. What would be different?"

✅ What the client names is usually the life task they are avoiding (relationships, work, intimacy, responsibility)

"Nothing at all? Not even small things?"
"And if the people close to you learned the problem was gone — would they notice a difference?"
Lifestyle investigationEarly recollections, family, birth order

The style of life (Lebensstil) is the unique map of the world the child creates by the age of 5-6. It answers three questions: "Who am I?", "What are others like?", "What is the world like?". The adult lives by this map even when it no longer matches reality.

EARLY RECOLLECTIONS

This is the main Adlerian diagnostic tool. Not because childhood "determines" — but because out of thousands of memories a person keeps precisely those that confirm their style of life. We remember what we "need" to remember.

"Tell me your earliest recollection — the very first thing you remember from childhood. A specific episode, not a repeated event."
"Close your eyes. What is the earliest image from childhood that comes up?"

For each memory clarify:

"How old were you?"
"Who else was in that scene?"
"Which moment is the most vivid — like a photograph?"
"What did you feel at that moment?"

✅ Collect 3-6 early recollections. Look for recurring themes: loneliness? danger? achievement? injustice? helplessness?

⚠️ Do not interpret each memory separately — look for the pattern across all of them together

FAMILY CONSTELLATION

Adler was the first to draw attention to the meaning of birth order and family atmosphere. What matters is not the biological fact of birth, but the psychological position of the child in the family.

"Tell me about your family: how many children, who is the oldest, who is the youngest?"
"Which of your brothers or sisters was most similar to you? And who was completely different?"
"What was the atmosphere in your family?"

Key questions:

"Which of the children was 'the good one'? Who was 'the difficult one'? Who was 'the smart one'?"
"How did your parents treat each of you?"
"What place did you occupy in the family?"
oldestyoungestmiddleonlytwin
PositionTypical patterns
OldestResponsibility, control, the "dethroned king" after younger siblings arrive
SecondCompetition with the oldest, "catching up", rebellion or imitation
Middle"Squeezed", looking for a unique niche, feels overlooked
YoungestPampered, either ambitious or helpless, everyone else is "ahead"
Only childCenter of attention, difficulty with equality, may be mature or dependent

⚠️ Birth order is not a diagnosis! It is a hypothesis for inquiry, not a label

Understanding private logicThe basic beliefs that drive the client

Private logic is the set of beliefs that seem to the client to be absolute truth, although in fact they are a subjective construction. "People are dangerous", "I must be perfect to be loved", "The world is unfair to me" — these are not facts but conclusions drawn by a child.

ELICITING PRIVATE LOGIC

Out of early recollections and the family constellation, the formula of the style of life begins to emerge:

"I am — …" (self-image) "Others are — …" (image of people) "The world is — …" (image of life) "Therefore I must — …" (survival strategy)

"If you could put in one sentence how you see yourself in the world — what would it be?"
"What rule about life did you pick up in childhood?"
"Let's go back to your early recollections. If that little boy/girl could draw a conclusion about the world from them — what would they decide?"

GOALS OF MISTAKEN BEHAVIOR

Adler and his student Rudolf Dreikurs described four goals that lie behind "problem" behavior. These are not conscious intentions but unconscious strategies of belonging.

GoalWhat the client doesWhat the therapist feelsThe client's belief
AttentionDemands, complains, sulksIrritation, urge to remind"I matter only when someone looks at me"
PowerArgues, resists, dominatesAnger, urge to win"I matter only when I am in control"
RevengeWounds, provokes, punishesHurt, urge to strike back"I was wounded — I wound in return"
Display of inadequacyGives up, does not try, avoidsDespair, urge to give up"I am not capable — expect nothing from me"

✅ Your own feelings in contact with the client are the best diagnostic tool for identifying the goal

Insight — connecting the patternHelp them see, without imposing interpretation

Adlerian insight is not the "opening up" of the unconscious. It is the moment when the client sees the connection between their early decisions and today's difficulties. Sees — and understands that they can choose otherwise.

TENTATIVE INTERPRETATION

The Adlerian offers interpretation as a hypothesis — gently, with the qualifiers "maybe", "I noticed", "it seems to me". The client has the right to disagree.

"It seems to me I see a pattern. May I share an observation?"
"I noticed that in your early recollections the theme of… keeps coming back. How does that sit with you?"
"Could it be that when you [behavior], you are really trying to [goal]?"

This is normal. Do not insist. Perhaps the hypothesis is off, or the client is not ready.

"All right. It is only a thought. Let's look at it from another angle."

⚠️ Never say "you do this because…" — that is not partnership but a verdict

"SPITTING IN THE CLIENT'S SOUP"

One of the most characteristic Adlerian techniques. You do not forbid the behavior — you make it less "tasty" by showing its hidden goal. After this the client may continue, but now with awareness.

T: "I notice that every time something goes well at work, you find a reason to drop it all." C: "Well, that's not quite right…" T: "Maybe. But it looks as though success is more dangerous for you than failure. As if, if you succeeded, something terrible would happen."

✅ After "spitting in the soup", the client often says: "Now I can't not notice it" — and that is the beginning of change

ReorientationFrom insight to action — new choices

Insight without action is intellectual play. Adlerian therapy moves to concrete changes: new behavior, new choices, a new relation to life tasks.

ENCOURAGEMENT

This is not a compliment and not praise for a result. Encouragement is recognition of effort, courage, movement — even when the result is not yet there. A discouraged person cannot risk and change.

"You decided to try — that is already a step."
"I see how much effort you put in, even when it is hard."
"You did not retreat, though it was frightening. What does that say about you?"
Encouragement
PraiseEncouragement
"Well done, you succeeded!""You tried, even though you were afraid — that is courage"
"Excellent result!""You put so much effort into this"
"You're the best!""You don't have to be the best to be valuable"

ACTING "AS IF"

"If you already were the person you want to become — what would you do differently this week?"
"Imagine you are already self-assured. How would you carry yourself tomorrow at the meeting?"

The "as if" technique (acting as if) — the client spends one week acting as if they already possess the quality they want. This is not "pretending" but an experiment: the experience of new behavior creates a new reality.

TASKS BETWEEN SESSIONS

The Adlerian gives concrete tasks linked to Adler's three life tasks: work, friendship, love.

"What would you like to try this week — something small but concrete?"
"What one step are you ready to take in the direction of what matters to you?"
Social interestGemeinschaftsgefühl — belonging and contribution

Social interest (Gemeinschaftsgefühl) is a central concept in Adler. It is not "sociability" and not "altruism". It is the feeling of belonging to humanity, the readiness to contribute, the sense of being part of something larger.

EXPLORING SOCIAL INTEREST

"Where in your life do you feel you belong? That you are in your own place?"
"When you do something for others — how do you feel while doing it?"
"Who needs you? Who do you need?"

Low social interest is, for Adler, the key marker of neurosis. The person withdraws into the self, competes instead of cooperating, avoids contribution. Therapy helps develop Gemeinschaftsgefühl — through the relationship with the therapist, and then through new actions in life.

THREE LIFE TASKS

TaskQuestions for exploration
WorkDo you find meaning in what you do? Do you contribute?
FriendshipAre there people with whom you feel equal?
LoveAre you capable of intimacy — without control and without dissolving?
"In which of the three areas is it hardest for you right now?"

✅ Some Adlerians add a fourth and fifth task: relationship with oneself (self-acceptance) and the existential task (meaning in life)

Closing the sessionSummary, task, encouragement

FEEDBACK

"What was the most important thing in today's session for you?"
"What are you taking with you?"
"Did anything surprise you?"

AGREEMENT

"What would you like to try before our next meeting?"
"What small step are you ready to take?"

The task should be concrete, achievable, and tied to one of the life tasks. Not "to become more confident", but "at tomorrow's meeting, voice one idea".

CLOSING ENCOURAGEMENT

"You were truly honest today — that takes courage. Thank you."
"I see that you are ready for change. Even if you don't yet fully believe it."

✅ Every session should end so that the client leaves with the sense: I am capable, I belong, I matter

Early RecollectionsEarly Recollections

The central diagnostic tool of Adlerian therapy. The client relates the earliest childhood memories — concrete episodes, not repeated events. Out of thousands of memories a person keeps precisely those that confirm their style of life; they function as a projective test revealing basic beliefs about the self, others, and the world.

  • 1. Ask the client to close their eyes and recall the earliest memory — a specific episode, not a repeated event
  • 2. Clarify the age, who was present, what exactly was happening
  • 3. Ask: which moment is the most vivid, like a photograph?
  • 4. Ask: what did you feel at that moment?
  • 5. Collect 3-6 memories
  • 6. Look for recurring themes across all the memories — this is the key to the style of life

When to use:

  • In the lifestyle-investigation stage (phase 2)
  • When you need to understand the client's basic beliefs
  • When updating the diagnostic hypothesis
  • In early sessions, to gather material

Key phrases:

Tell me your earliest recollection — the very first thing you remember from childhood
Close your eyes. What is the earliest image from childhood that comes up?

Follow-up questions:

How old were you?
Who else was in that scene?
Which moment is the most vivid?
What did you feel?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not interpret each memory separately — look for the pattern across them all
  • ⚠️ It must be a specific episode, not 'we went to the dacha every summer'
  • ⚠️ Do not rush the client — give time to settle in

Adler A. What Life Could Mean to You

The QuestionThe Question

A classic diagnostic question: "If I could wave a magic wand and your symptom disappeared tomorrow morning — what would change in your life?" The answer points to the life task the client is avoiding. Whatever they name — work, relationships, intimacy — is what the symptom "protects" them from.

  • 1. Ask The Question in its classic wording
  • 2. Give the client time to think — do not rush
  • 3. Listen to the answer, clarify the details
  • 4. If 'nothing would change' — ask about small things, about the reactions of people close to them
  • 5. Link the answer to the life tasks (work, friendship, love)
  • 6. Discuss: could the symptom be a way of avoiding this task?

When to use:

  • In the first sessions, for diagnostic purposes
  • When the client is fixated on the symptom
  • To differentiate organic from psychogenic complaints
  • When you need to reveal the avoided life task

Key phrases:

If I could wave a magic wand and your symptom disappeared tomorrow morning — what would change in your life?
Imagine the problem is gone. What would be different?

Follow-up questions:

What would you do differently?
What would the people close to you notice?
What opportunity would this open up?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not use it as a coaching 'magic wand' — it is a diagnostic tool
  • ⚠️ The client may not immediately see the link between symptom and avoidance
  • ⚠️ Do not argue if the client says 'nothing would change' — inquire further

Adler A. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology

Family Constellation AnalysisFamily Constellation Analysis

Inquiry into the client's psychological position in the family: birth order, sibling relationships, family atmosphere, the role of each child. What matters is not the biological fact but the subjective perception: how the client experienced their place in the family. Family patterns often reappear in adult life.

  • 1. Ask about the composition of the family: how many children, who is the oldest, who is the youngest
  • 2. Clarify the age differences and the characteristics of each sibling
  • 3. Ask: which child was 'the good one'? 'the difficult one'? 'the smart one'?
  • 4. Inquire who was similar to the client and who was quite different
  • 5. Ask about the atmosphere in the family and the relationship between the parents
  • 6. Link the family position to current relational patterns

When to use:

  • In the lifestyle-investigation stage
  • In relationship problems — at work, in the couple, with friends
  • When the client competes or, conversely, yields
  • To understand the client's model of relating

Key phrases:

Tell me about your family: how many children, who is the oldest, who is the youngest?
What place did you occupy in the family?

Follow-up questions:

Which of your brothers or sisters was most similar to you?
Which child was 'the good one'? Who was 'the difficult one'?
How did your parents treat each of you?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Birth order is a hypothesis, not a diagnosis. Do not pin on labels
  • ⚠️ Subjective experience matters more than the objective fact
  • ⚠️ Avoid accusations aimed at the parents — this is inquiry, not a courtroom

Adler A. Understanding Human Nature

Lifestyle AssessmentLifestyle Assessment

A comprehensive inquiry into the whole personality pattern. Includes early recollections, family constellation, dream analysis, observation of behavior in session. The product is a style-of-life formula: "I am …, others are …, the world is …, therefore I must …". This formula organizes the client's whole life.

  • 1. Collect early recollections (3-6 of them)
  • 2. Inquire into the family constellation and birth order
  • 3. Identify recurring themes and patterns
  • 4. Formulate a hypothesis about the client's private logic
  • 5. Offer the client the formula: 'I am …, others are …, the world is …, therefore …'
  • 6. Discuss: how does this formula operate in today's life?

When to use:

  • At the start of therapy, in the diagnostic phase
  • When you need to see the whole picture
  • When therapy gets stuck — return to the basics
  • To plan the direction of the work

Key phrases:

If you could put in one sentence how you see yourself in the world — what would it be?
What rule about life did you pick up in childhood?

Follow-up questions:

How does this rule show up now — at work, in relationships?
Does this rule help you or limit you?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The style of life is a hypothesis, not a verdict. Offer it gently
  • ⚠️ Do not rush the formulation — gather enough material first
  • ⚠️ The client may disagree — that is normal; refine together

Mosak H. Maniacci M. A Primer of Adlerian Psychology

EncouragementEncouragement

The central therapeutic technique of Adlerian therapy. Not praise for a result, but recognition of effort, courage, movement. A discouraged client cannot risk and change. Encouragement restores faith in one's own strength and the sense of belonging. This is not a one-off intervention — it is the therapist's stance.

  • 1. Notice the client's effort — even a small one, even an unsuccessful one
  • 2. Name the effort: 'You tried, although you were afraid'
  • 3. Separate result from process: 'What matters is not the outcome, but that you dared'
  • 4. Link to the client's qualities: 'That speaks of your courage'
  • 5. Convey faith: 'I see that you are capable of this'

When to use:

  • In every session — it is the base position
  • When the client devalues their own steps
  • After a failed attempt to change something
  • When the client compares themselves to others

Key phrases:

You decided to try — that is already a step
I see how much effort you put in, even when it is hard

Follow-up questions:

What does it say about you — that you came here, in spite of the fear?
You did not retreat, although you were afraid

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not confuse encouragement with praise: 'Well done!' is evaluation, not encouragement
  • ⚠️ Do not be falsely positive — encouragement must be genuine
  • ⚠️ Do not encourage the result — only the effort and the courage

Dreikurs R. Psychology in the Classroom

Acting As IfActing As If

The client spends one week acting as if they already possess the quality they want — confidence, courage, calm. This is not pretense but a behavioral experiment: new experience creates a new self-perception. The technique rests on the Adlerian principle: change the behavior and the feeling will follow.

  • 1. Identify the quality the client lacks (confidence, courage, calm)
  • 2. Ask: 'If you already were that kind of person — what would you do differently?'
  • 3. Together choose a concrete behavior for the experiment
  • 4. Agree on a timeframe (usually a week)
  • 5. In the next session, discuss: what happened when you acted 'as if'?
  • 6. Analyze: how did others react? How did you feel?

When to use:

  • In the reorientation stage (phase 4)
  • When the client says 'I can't' or 'I am not that kind'
  • To move from insight to action
  • When a habitual behavior pattern must be broken

Key phrases:

If you already were the person you want to become — what would you do differently this week?
Imagine you are already self-assured. How would you carry yourself tomorrow?

Follow-up questions:

What would the people around you notice?
What is the smallest step you are ready to take?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ This is an experiment, not an assignment — the client must want to try
  • ⚠️ Start small — not 'become another person', but 'try one thing differently'
  • ⚠️ Do not punish for 'non-completion' — discuss what got in the way

Adler A. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology

Spitting in the Client's SoupSpitting in the Client's Soup

The therapist does not forbid the neurotic behavior but makes it less "tasty" by exposing its hidden goal. Once the client sees why they are doing it, the behavior loses its unconscious appeal. The client may continue, but no longer in the dark — and that changes everything.

  • 1. Notice the recurring neurotic pattern
  • 2. Identify the hidden goal of this behavior
  • 3. Gently, often with humor, name that goal aloud
  • 4. Do not forbid, do not condemn — simply make it visible
  • 5. Discuss: 'Now that you see this — how is it to continue?'

When to use:

  • When the client uses the symptom to reach a hidden goal
  • In chronic self-sabotage of progress
  • When the behavior 'works' to avoid a life task
  • When the client is ready for confrontation (phases 3-4)

Key phrases:

I notice that every time something starts to work, you find a reason to stop. As if success is more dangerous for you than failure
It seems your headache always shows up just when you have to do what you don't want to do

Follow-up questions:

How does it sit with you — when I say this out loud?
Now that you see it — how will it be to go on in the old way?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Timing is crucial — do not use it before a strong alliance has formed
  • ⚠️ The tone must be warm, possibly with humor — not accusatory
  • ⚠️ The client may get angry — this is a normal reaction; do not retreat, but do not press

Adler A. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology

Mistaken Goals AnalysisMistaken Goals Analysis

Rudolf Dreikurs's technique for identifying the unconscious goal behind problem behavior. Four goals: attention, power, revenge, display of inadequacy. The diagnostic key is the therapist's feelings: irritation points to the goal of attention, anger to power, hurt to revenge, despair to inadequacy.

  • 1. Observe the client's problem behavior (in life or in session)
  • 2. Pay attention to your own feelings in response to this behavior
  • 3. Identify the goal using Dreikurs's table
  • 4. Check the hypothesis: 'Could it be that when you do [behavior], you are trying to [goal]?'
  • 5. Explore the belief behind the goal
  • 6. Offer an alternative route to belonging

When to use:

  • In recurring conflicts in relationships
  • When the client's behavior provokes strong feelings in the therapist
  • In work with children and adolescents
  • When the client is 'stuck' in a destructive pattern

Key phrases:

Could it be that when you act this way, you are really trying to…
I notice that when this happens, I feel… And what do others feel?

Follow-up questions:

What do you want to get when you behave this way?
How do people around you react? Is that what you expected?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The goals are unconscious — do not accuse the client of intentionality
  • ⚠️ Use your own feelings as a tool, not as a reason to react
  • ⚠️ In adults the goals may be less obvious than in children

Dreikurs R. Soltz V. Children: The Challenge

Task SettingTask Setting

The Adlerian therapist gives concrete tasks linked to the client's life tasks. The task must be small, concrete, and achievable — not 'become more confident', but 'at tomorrow's meeting, voice one idea'. The aim: translate insight into action and create the experience of new behavior.

  • 1. Identify which life task is active (work, friendship, love)
  • 2. Together formulate a concrete step
  • 3. Make sure the task is achievable — small but meaningful
  • 4. Discuss possible obstacles
  • 5. Next session: what happened? What got in the way? What did you learn?

When to use:

  • At the end of each session in the reorientation stage
  • When there is insight but no action
  • To consolidate new behavior
  • When the client is avoiding one of the life tasks

Key phrases:

What would you like to try this week — something small but concrete?
What one step are you ready to take?

Follow-up questions:

Is this step small enough that you can definitely do it?
What might get in the way? How will you handle that?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ A task is not a teacher's homework. It is a shared decision
  • ⚠️ Do not punish non-completion — inquire what got in the way
  • ⚠️ The task should connect to a life task, not to the symptom

Mosak H. Maniacci M. A Primer of Adlerian Psychology

Paradoxical IntentionParadoxical Intention

The client is invited to deliberately intensify or bring on the symptom. When a person tries to do on purpose what they fear, fear loses its power. Adler used this technique long before Frankl, who later systematized it within logotherapy. It rests on the principle: what you do on purpose stops being involuntary.

  • 1. Identify the symptom the client is trying to control (insomnia, stammering, anxiety)
  • 2. Suggest: 'What if we tried to do it on purpose?'
  • 3. Explain the logic: when you try not to be afraid, the fear grows. Try being afraid on purpose
  • 4. Discuss the result in the next session
  • 5. Analyze: what happened when you stopped fighting the symptom?

When to use:

  • In insomnia: 'try to stay awake for as long as possible'
  • In anticipatory anxiety: 'try to induce the anxiety on purpose'
  • In stammering: 'try to stammer on purpose'
  • When fighting the symptom only strengthens it

Key phrases:

What if, instead of fighting it, you tried to do it on purpose?
Try tonight to stay awake as long as you can — on purpose

Follow-up questions:

How was it to try to produce the symptom on purpose?
What happened when you stopped fighting?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not use with suicidal thoughts or self-harm
  • ⚠️ Deliver with humor and warmth, not as provocation
  • ⚠️ Explain the logic — otherwise the client may hear it as mockery

Adler A. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology

Tentative InterpretationTentative Interpretation

Adlerian interpretation differs fundamentally from psychoanalytic interpretation. It is offered as a hypothesis — gently, with the qualifiers "maybe", "it seems to me", "I noticed". The client has the right to disagree, and this is not "resistance" but feedback: the hypothesis may be off.

  • 1. Gather enough material (memories, family, current patterns)
  • 2. Formulate a hypothesis about the style of life or private logic
  • 3. Offer the hypothesis gently: 'It seems to me I see a pattern…'
  • 4. Observe the reaction — recognition, surprise, disagreement
  • 5. If the client disagrees — refine or set aside; do not insist

When to use:

  • In the insight stage (phase 3)
  • When enough data has accumulated for a hypothesis
  • When the client repeats a pattern and does not notice it
  • To connect early recollections with current difficulties

Key phrases:

It seems to me I see a pattern. May I share an observation?
I noticed that in your early recollections the theme of … keeps coming back. How does that sit with you?

Follow-up questions:

How is it for you? Does it resonate?
Could it be otherwise? What would you correct in my observation?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Never say 'you do this because…' — that is a verdict, not a hypothesis
  • ⚠️ If the client disagrees — that is information, not resistance
  • ⚠️ Do not overload with interpretations — one per session is enough

Mosak H. Maniacci M. A Primer of Adlerian Psychology

Catching OneselfCatching Oneself

The client learns to notice the moment when the habitual pattern "kicks in" — before it unfolds fully. First they "catch" themselves after the event; then in the middle; finally, before it starts. This develops awareness and opens a space for choice.

  • 1. Identify the specific pattern the client wants to change
  • 2. Describe the 'signals' — what happens just before the pattern kicks in
  • 3. First stage: 'catch' yourself after — simply notice in hindsight
  • 4. Second stage: notice in the middle — 'Oh, I'm doing it again'
  • 5. Third stage: notice before it starts — catch the impulse and choose differently
  • 6. Track the progress: from 'after' to 'in the middle' to 'before'

When to use:

  • In the reorientation stage
  • After insight about a lifestyle pattern
  • When working with automatic reactions
  • When the client says 'I understand, but I can't stop'

Key phrases:

This week just try to notice — when you start doing it. Not to change it, just to notice
You already caught yourself — that is progress. Before you noticed it afterward, now you notice it mid-action

Follow-up questions:

When did you notice? What was the signal?
What happened when you caught yourself?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not expect instant change — first awareness, then action
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into self-criticism: 'again!' — instead: 'I noticed!'
  • ⚠️ Encourage every 'catch' — that is already progress

Mosak H. Maniacci M. A Primer of Adlerian Psychology

Dream AnalysisDream Analysis

The Adlerian approach to dreams differs from the Freudian one. A dream is not the fulfillment of a repressed wish but a "rehearsal" of future action. The dream creates a mood that sustains the client's style of life. Dream analysis helps see which emotional state the client is "preparing" for themselves.

  • 1. Ask for the dream in detail — all elements, sensations, feelings
  • 2. Ask: what mood did you wake up in?
  • 3. Ask: what was happening in your life before this dream?
  • 4. Explore: what action does this mood prepare?
  • 5. Link the theme of the dream to the client's style of life

When to use:

  • When the client brings a dream to the session
  • To deepen understanding of the style of life
  • When the client is in a transitional period
  • As a complement to early recollections

Key phrases:

Tell me the dream in as much detail as you can — what you saw, what you felt
What mood did you wake up in after this dream?

Follow-up questions:

What was happening in your life before this dream?
What decision does this mood help you make?
If this dream were a metaphor — what would it be about?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not search for hidden Freudian symbols — Adler worked differently
  • ⚠️ Focus on the mood and the function of the dream, not on its content
  • ⚠️ The dream is not a prediction but a preparation of an emotional state

Adler A. What Life Could Mean to You

Social Interest ExplorationSocial Interest Exploration

Assessment and development of social interest (Gemeinschaftsgefühl) — the sense of belonging to humanity, readiness to contribute, capacity to see the world through another's eyes. Low social interest is, for Adler, the key marker of neurosis. Therapy helps develop it through relationship and action.

  • 1. Explore the current level of social interest: belonging, contribution, empathy
  • 2. Ask about the three life tasks: work, friendship, love
  • 3. Identify which task holds the greatest deficit
  • 4. Look for resources: where does the client ALREADY show social interest?
  • 5. Offer concrete steps to develop the sense of community

When to use:

  • Throughout therapy — as a background theme
  • In isolation, loneliness, estrangement
  • When the client competes instead of cooperating
  • In an egocentric style of life

Key phrases:

Where in your life do you feel you belong? That you are in your own place?
Who needs you? Who do you need?

Follow-up questions:

When you do something for others — how do you feel while doing it?
In which of the three areas is it hardest for you right now?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Social interest is not conformism and not self-sacrifice
  • ⚠️ Do not press: 'you should help people' — that is the opposite of the approach
  • ⚠️ The development of social interest begins in the therapeutic relationship

Adler A. Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind

Logical ConsequencesLogical Consequences

Unlike punishment (which is arbitrary and often humiliating), logical consequences are the natural outcome of a choice. The therapist helps the client see the link between their decisions and their consequences. Not punishment, but reality. Widely used in Adlerian parenting and therapy.

  • 1. Identify the behavior and its consequences
  • 2. Show the link: 'When you choose X — Y happens'
  • 3. Underline: this is not punishment, but the result of your choice
  • 4. Ask: 'If you don't like the consequence — what could you choose differently?'
  • 5. Support readiness for a new choice

When to use:

  • When the client does not see the link between their behavior and the result
  • In work with parents — as an alternative to punishment
  • When the client blames circumstances instead of taking responsibility
  • In recurring complaints about the same situation

Key phrases:

When you choose not to speak about your feelings — what usually happens next?
This is not a punishment. It is simply what follows from your choice

Follow-up questions:

If this consequence does not suit you — what other choice do you see?
What would change if next time you acted differently?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Logical consequences are not punishment in polite clothing
  • ⚠️ The tone must be respectful and compassionate, not gloating
  • ⚠️ Do not use when the client is in crisis — stabilize first

Dreikurs R. Grey L. A New Approach to Discipline: Logical Consequences

Courage to Be ImperfectCourage to Be Imperfect

Rudolf Dreikurs's concept. Perfectionism is one of the most common neurotic strategies: if I cannot be perfect, I would rather not try. The therapist helps the client accept imperfection as the norm and find the courage to act without waiting for guarantees of success.

  • 1. Surface the perfectionist beliefs: 'I must be flawless'
  • 2. Show the cost of perfectionism: what does the client NOT do out of fear of error?
  • 3. Normalize imperfection: a mistake is not a failure but information
  • 4. Offer an experiment: do something 'well enough', not perfectly
  • 5. Encourage: the courage to try matters more than a flawless result

When to use:

  • In perfectionism and procrastination
  • When the client avoids action out of fear of mistakes
  • In imposter syndrome
  • When the client devalues their achievements

Key phrases:

What if you don't have to be perfect to be valuable?
The courage to be imperfect is not weakness — it is strength

Follow-up questions:

What do you NOT do out of fear of doing it imperfectly?
What does the attempt to be flawless cost you?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not devalue the pursuit of quality — the issue is not quality but fear
  • ⚠️ Do not say 'just relax' — that does not work with perfectionists
  • ⚠️ Start small — do not propose 'fail in public' right away

Dreikurs R. Social Equality: The Challenge of Today

Push Button TechniquePush Button Technique

The client recalls a pleasant memory, notices their feelings, then switches to an unpleasant one — and notices the feelings again. The technique shows that emotions do not "happen" to us — we create them by choosing what to focus on. It returns to the client a sense of control over their emotional state.

  • 1. Ask the client to close their eyes
  • 2. Recall a pleasant memory — immerse fully
  • 3. Ask: what do you feel right now?
  • 4. Switch to an unpleasant memory
  • 5. Ask: and what do you feel now?
  • 6. Return to the pleasant one. Discuss: you yourself chose which 'button' to press
  • 7. Summarize: your feelings depend on where you direct your attention

When to use:

  • When the client feels they are a victim of their emotions
  • In rumination and getting stuck in negative thoughts
  • To demonstrate cognitive control over emotion
  • In early sessions — for psychoeducation

Key phrases:

Close your eyes. Recall a moment when you were truly happy. Immerse yourself in it
And now switch to an unpleasant memory. What changed in your feelings?

Follow-up questions:

Who pressed the button? Who chose what to focus on?
What does this say about your capacity to influence your feelings?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not simplify to 'think positive' — it is about awareness of choice
  • ⚠️ Do not use with clients in acute grief — inappropriate
  • ⚠️ This is an entry-level technique — it does not replace deep lifestyle work

Mosak H. Maniacci M. A Primer of Adlerian Psychology

Anti-Suggestion TechniqueAnti-Suggestion Technique

When a client systematically devalues their successes or sabotages progress, the therapist predicts that sabotage in advance. "I notice that every time things start to work, you find a way to retreat. I'll bet something will get in the way this week too." This makes the sabotage conscious and takes away its force.

  • 1. Notice the pattern of sabotage: the client regularly undoes progress
  • 2. Name the pattern aloud, gently and with humor
  • 3. Predict: 'I expect something will get in the way this week again'
  • 4. In the next session: discuss what happened
  • 5. If the sabotage did not occur — encourage. If it did — 'I did warn you, right?'

When to use:

  • In chronic sabotage of therapy progress
  • When the client devalues their achievements
  • In the 'two steps forward, three back' pattern
  • When the therapist feels frustration from repetition

Key phrases:

I notice a pattern: every time things start to work, something gets in the way. What will it be this week?
You did brilliantly. Now I'm curious — how will you undo it?

Follow-up questions:

What happened? Was I right?
Interesting — you did not sabotage it. What was different?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Requires a strong alliance — do not use in early sessions
  • ⚠️ The tone is warm humor, not sarcasm
  • ⚠️ If the client takes offense — return to empathy at once

Carlson J. Watts R. Maniacci M. Adlerian Therapy: Theory and Practice

Life Tasks AssessmentLife Tasks Assessment

A systematic assessment of Adler's three (or five) life tasks: work, friendship, love (+ relationship with oneself, existential meaning). The therapist explores which tasks the client manages well, which are avoided, and what balance there is between them. Neurosis is always an evasion of one or more tasks.

  • 1. Ask about each life task: work, friendship, love
  • 2. Assess: where is the client functioning well? Where do they avoid?
  • 3. Explore: what gets in the way? What beliefs sit behind the avoidance?
  • 4. Link to the symptom: how does the symptom 'protect' from the task?
  • 5. Identify the priority direction of the work

When to use:

  • At the start of therapy for diagnostic orientation
  • When the client complains about 'everything' and it is unclear what specifically
  • To define the focus of work
  • When revising therapy goals

Key phrases:

Let's look at three large areas of your life: work, friendship, love. Where are you doing well? Where is it difficult?
In which of the three areas is it hardest for you right now?

Follow-up questions:

What gets in your way in this area? What frightens you?
What belief sits behind this avoidance?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not assess 'objectively' — what matters is the client's subjective experience
  • ⚠️ Do not press on the 'weak' area — the client avoids it for a reason
  • ⚠️ Sometimes the fourth task (relationship with oneself) matters more than the first three

Adler A. What Life Could Mean to You

Asset-Focused ReframingAsset-Focused Reframing

Adlerian reframing: a quality the client sees as a shortcoming is reconsidered as a resource or a strength used inefficiently. "Stubbornness" becomes "persistence", "anxiety" becomes "sensitivity to danger", "dependence" becomes "the capacity for closeness".

  • 1. Listen to how the client describes their 'shortcoming'
  • 2. Find the resource side of this quality
  • 3. Offer a reformulation: 'What if we looked at this differently?'
  • 4. Discuss: how to use this quality constructively?
  • 5. Link to the courage to be imperfect

When to use:

  • When the client criticizes themselves for 'bad' qualities
  • In low self-esteem and devaluation
  • To develop self-acceptance
  • When the client sees only the negatives

Key phrases:

You say you are stubborn. What if this is persistence directed in the wrong place?
Your anxiety is sensitivity. The question is — sensitive to what, and how to use it

Follow-up questions:

When has this quality helped you?
How could you direct this energy constructively?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not devalue the client's suffering — acknowledge the pain first, then reframe
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into positive thinking: 'everything's fine!' — that is not reframing
  • ⚠️ Reframing works after empathy, not instead of it

Carlson J. Watts R. Maniacci M. Adlerian Therapy: Theory and Practice

Symptom ReframingSymptom Reframing

The symptom is seen not as an enemy but as a creative solution — imperfect though it may be. "Your anxiety is the way you are protecting yourself. It was once useful. The question is — do you still need it now?" This ends the war with the symptom and opens the path to replacing it.

  • 1. Listen to the complaint about the symptom
  • 2. Explore: what does the symptom 'do' for the client? What does it protect from?
  • 3. Acknowledge the creativity of the solution: 'You found a way to cope — not ideal, but a way'
  • 4. Ask: 'Do you still need this way? Or are there others?'
  • 5. Together look for alternative strategies

When to use:

  • When the client is at war with the symptom
  • To reduce self-criticism and a feeling of defectiveness
  • When fighting the symptom only strengthens it
  • To move from 'get rid of it' to 'understand and replace'

Key phrases:

Your anxiety is not your enemy. It is the way you are trying to protect yourself
This symptom was once useful. The question is — do you still need it now?

Follow-up questions:

What would you lose if the symptom were gone?
What function does it carry in your life?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not devalue suffering: 'your symptom is useful' can sound like 'you have nothing to complain about'
  • ⚠️ Empathy first, reframing after
  • ⚠️ Do not apply in severe somatic conditions without medical context

Carlson J. Watts R. Maniacci M. Adlerian Therapy: Theory and Practice

Lifestyle MetaphorLifestyle Metaphor

Therapist and client together create a metaphor that captures the essence of the style of life. "You are like a driver who always brakes at a green light" or "You build a fortress to protect yourself, but inside it is lonely." The metaphor makes abstract understanding vivid and memorable.

  • 1. From the style of life, find an image-metaphor
  • 2. Offer it to the client: 'An image comes to me… How is that for you?'
  • 3. Let the client refine or change the metaphor
  • 4. Use the metaphor in further work as a 'language' for discussing the pattern
  • 5. When change happens — update the metaphor

When to use:

  • After the lifestyle investigation
  • When insight needs to become memorable
  • To ease a conversation about difficult patterns
  • When the client thinks in images

Key phrases:

An image comes to me: you are like someone who builds a wall around themselves so they won't be hurt. But behind the wall — it is lonely
It seems you are running a marathon that no one asked you to run. What if you could just walk?

Follow-up questions:

How is this image for you? What would you add or change?
If you could change one thing in this picture — what would it be?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The metaphor is an offer, not an imposition. The client may offer their own
  • ⚠️ Avoid hurtful or humiliating images
  • ⚠️ The metaphor must be simple and recognizable

Kopp R. Metaphor Therapy: Using Client-Generated Metaphors in Psychotherapy

ALLIANCE

FOCUS

INTERVENTIONS

PRESENCE

CLOSING

🔧 Adapted diary
This approach does not define a standardized client diary. We prepared an adapted version based on its key concepts. If you have suggestions, write to us.
Diary of Movement

Adler's Individual Psychology helps notice the style of life, goals behind behavior and movement toward life tasks.

By writing down concrete situations, you can see habitual patterns and choose a more courageous next step.

Write down the situation → reaction → goal of behavior → pattern → alternative step.

12345678910
Materials are informational and educational and summarize publicly available scientific sources. They are not medical or psychological advice, are not intended for self-diagnosis or self-treatment, and do not replace consultation with a qualified professional.