← Techniques

Socratic Dialogue / Philosophical Inquiry

Socratic Dialogue / Philosophical Inquiry
💡 Clarification 🧠 Cognition

Van Deurzen was deeply influenced by Plato and Socrates. Therapy in her understanding is a joint philosophical inquiry, a dialogue of two people trying to make sense of what is right, what is true, what is important. The therapist takes the position of sincere not-knowing — not an expert with answers, but a "midwife of thought" (after Socrates). Direct clarifying questions, an honest pointing-out of contradictions, joint thinking — the main tools of this approach.

Step-by-step guide

  1. Take the position of sincere not-knowing: the therapist does not know the answer in advance — they honestly inquire together with the client
  2. Ask clarifying questions that help the client clarify their own thought
  3. When needed — point to contradictions in the client's words directly and without judgment
  4. Jointly inquire into the consequences of a belief or choice: "If this is so, what follows from it?"
  5. Arrive at a clearer, more considered understanding — not at a "correct answer", but at greater transparency for the client themselves

When to use

  • When working with beliefs, values, moral dilemmas
  • When working with intellectually oriented clients
  • When the client gets stuck in circular reasoning
  • When the client declares a belief without noticing its inner contradictions
  • When working with sedimented beliefs and worldview

Key phrases

Help me understand — when you say this, what exactly do you mean? I want to make sure I understand correctly.

Follow-up questions

If you believe this, what follows from it?
Earlier you said one thing, and now another — how do these two statements fit together?
I am not sure I understand. Can we inquire into this together?

Alternative phrasings

Interesting — you said both this and that. How do they coexist in your head? It is not obvious to me.

Warnings

  • ⚠️ The Socratic dialogue must not turn into an intellectual fight or a sense that the client is being "caught out" on contradictions
  • ⚠️ The spirit is joint honest inquiry, not a debate; if that spirit is lost — stop
  • ⚠️ With emotional vulnerability — first support, dialogue later

Source: van Deurzen E. 2002, 2012, 2015; Plato/Socrates via van Deurzen

Similar techniques

Materials are informational and educational and summarize publicly available scientific sources. They are not medical or psychological advice, are not intended for self-diagnosis or self-treatment, and do not replace consultation with a qualified professional.