← Library

Existential Therapy (Deurzen)

Deurzen
«To live is to enter into dialogue with the inevitabilities of existence.»
Definition

Emmy van Deurzen's existential therapy is a philosophically oriented approach that treats therapy not as the cure of an illness but as an inquiry into the way a person lives their life. The central tool is the phenomenological method; the central model is the four dimensions of being (physical, social, personal, spiritual), in each of which the person meets polarities and paradoxes. This is the leading approach of the British school of existential therapy.

Founder(s) and history

Emmy van Deurzen (b. 1951) — a Dutch-British existential therapist and philosopher.

Born in the Netherlands. She received a double education — in philosophy and psychology — which shaped the character of her approach: therapy as applied philosophy, not a medical procedure.

She moved to the United Kingdom, where she became a key figure of the British existential school. She founded the New School of Psychotherapy and Counselling (NSPC) in London — the first institution fully devoted to existential therapy. She founded the (SEA) — a professional community of practitioners — and the journal of the same name, Existential Analysis.

Van Deurzen developed the existential tradition in several directions. She added a fourth dimension of being (Überwelt — the spiritual / worldview dimension) to Binswanger's three (Umwelt, Mitwelt, Eigenwelt). She built a system of emotional polarities — the "emotional compass", in which each emotion is treated not as a symptom but as a navigator pointing to a value or need. She adapted philosophical phenomenology (Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre) into a practical therapeutic method.

Van Deurzen consistently opposes the medical model in psychotherapy: therapy is not the cure of an illness, but help in making sense of life.

Van Deurzen: "I do not cure people. I help them make sense of how they live, and to live more consciously."

Key concepts

The four dimensions of being

A model that describes the four worlds in which every person exists at the same time. In each dimension — its own polarities, its own values, its own existential challenges.

Physical dimension (Umwelt) — the world of nature and the body. Health and illness, comfort and pain, life and death. Relations with the body, nature, things, material safety. Existential challenge: to accept the finitude of the body and physical vulnerability.

Social dimension (Mitwelt) — the world of other people. Closeness and loneliness, belonging and rejection, love and hate. Roles, power, conflicts, culture. Existential challenge: to be with others without losing oneself; to be oneself without losing others.

Personal dimension (Eigenwelt) — the world of the self. Identity, self-esteem, inner dialogue, memory and the past. Strength and weakness, confidence and doubt. Existential challenge: to know oneself honestly — accepting both strength and weakness.

Spiritual dimension (Überwelt) — the world of meanings and values. Worldview, faith, ideals, conscience. Meaning and absurdity, hope and despair. Existential challenge: to create meaning, knowing that there is no absolute truth.

Überwelt is van Deurzen's unique contribution. Binswanger described three dimensions; she added a fourth, accounting for values, worldview, and the relationship to the unknown.

The phenomenological method

An adaptation of philosophical phenomenology for clinical practice. Four steps:

1. Description — the client describes the experience as concretely as possible; the therapist helps to widen and deepen the description with "what" and "how" questions, not "why" 2. Horizontalization — all elements of the experience are treated as equally important; the therapist sets aside their theories (epoche) 3. Equalization — attention to what is minimized or skipped; the search for patterns and blind spots 4. Verification — checking the understanding with the client; the client is the expert of their own experience

Epoche (suspension of judgment) — the deliberate setting aside of one's theories, assumptions, values, and experience. The therapist sets aside the thought "this sounds like narcissism" or "surely it has to do with childhood" — and stays with what the client describes. Full epoche is impossible, but striving toward it makes the therapist more accurate.

The emotional compass

A system of emotional polarities organized along the four dimensions of being. Each emotion has a "positive" and a "negative" pole and points to a specific value or need.

In the physical dimension: anxiety — courage (a response to threat). In the social: loneliness — belonging (the need for connection), shame — pride (the relation to evaluation). In the personal: guilt — responsibility (loyalty to values), doubt — confidence. In the spiritual: despair — hope (the relation to the future), boredom — inspiration (the need for meaning).

The principle of the work: not to remove the "negative" emotion but to inquire which value it points to. Help the client move between the poles, not get stuck on one.

The paradoxes of existence

Life is full of paradoxes that cannot be resolved — they can only be acknowledged and lived in the tension between the poles. Striving for closeness sharpens the awareness of loneliness. Striving for meaning exposes absurdity. Striving for freedom reveals limits. The task of therapy is not to remove the paradoxes, but to help the client live with them.

Worldview mapping

An inquiry into the client's basic assumptions about the world, the self, others, and life. These assumptions are often unconscious and shape the way all four dimensions are lived. The therapist helps to bring them into the light — not in order to "fix" them, but so the client can consciously choose how to relate to them.

Against the medical model

Van Deurzen consistently opposes the pathologization of human experience. Anxiety, sadness, anger, loneliness — are not symptoms to be removed, but normal responses to life situations. Diagnostic labels get in the way of seeing the person. Therapy is not treatment, but a joint philosophical inquiry into the client's life.

Van Deurzen: "Happiness is not the absence of suffering, but the capacity to fully experience the whole spectrum of emotions."

Format of therapy

Individual therapy: usually once a week, 50 minutes.

Length varies from short-term (10–20 sessions) to long-term (a year or more).

Session structure: a phenomenological inquiry into the client's experience, mapping of the four dimensions, work with the polarities. The therapist acts as a philosophical companion — does not cure and does not direct, but helps to see more clearly.

The approach is also applied in couple therapy, group work, coaching, and supervision. Van Deurzen actively develops existential coaching as a separate direction.

It is especially in demand in existential crises, loss of meaning, identity crises, life transitions, cultural adaptation, loss and grief, anxiety and uncertainty, problems of choice, value crises, and professional burnout.

Evidence base
  • Vos et al. (2015) — meta-analysis of existential and meaning-oriented therapies: a moderate effect (d = 0.35) for depression, anxiety, and existential distress
  • Correia et al. (2016) — systematic review of 60 studies of existential therapies: positive results for anxiety, depression, and adaptation to chronic illness
  • Rayner & Vitali (2016) — a study of phenomenological therapy in practice: clients note an improvement in self-understanding and the ability to handle life difficulties
  • Sousa (2004) — qualitative research of the client experience of existential therapy: increased awareness, acceptance of paradoxes, improved quality of life
  • Cooper (2003, 2016) — systematic reviews of existential therapies (including van Deurzen's approach): moderate effectiveness, comparable to other humanistic modalities

The British existential school is studied mostly with qualitative methods (phenomenological research, case studies). There are few randomized controlled trials — van Deurzen on principle criticizes the medical model of researching therapy.

Limits
  • Requires a high level of reflection from the client — not suitable for everyone
  • Less structured than CBT — harder for clients looking for step-by-step instructions
  • Does not replace medication for severe mental disorders
  • Most of the literature is in English; only a small part of van Deurzen's work has been translated into Russian
  • The principled refusal of diagnostic categories can be a problem in medical institutions and insurance systems
  • The evidence base is limited: few RCTs, qualitative research and clinical descriptions predominate
  • A therapist without philosophical training may apply the four-dimensions model superficially, reducing it to a classification instead of phenomenological inquiry
  • Critics point out that the refusal of diagnostics can lead to underestimating the severity of the client's state
Therapeutic stancePhilosophical companion — together we inquire into the landscape of existence

The person before you is not ill and not broken. They have met paradoxes of existence that cannot be "solved" — only learned to be lived with

Your task is not to make life easier, but to help the client see it more clearly and choose more consciously

THERAPIST'S STANCE

"I am not here to cure you. I am here to make sense, together with you, of how you live."

✅ The therapist is a philosophical companion, not an expert and not a healer

✅ The task is to help the client see their life more clearly, not to "fix" them

✅ The position of naive curiosity — you do not know in advance how the client's world is built

⚠️ Do not give diagnoses — van Deurzen rejects the medical model

⚠️ Do not give advice — help the client find their own wisdom

⚠️ Do not interpret describe and ask

Van Deurzen: "Existential therapy is not the cure of an illness, but learning the art of living."

THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL STANCE

Three rules:

1. Epoché (suspension) — set aside your assumptions, theories, and judgments 2. Description, not explanation — what the client is experiencing, not why 3. Equalization — all aspects of experience are equally important until proven otherwise

We do not doWe do
Interpret through theoryDescribe what we see and hear
"This is your fear of death""What exactly do you feel when you think about it?"
Look for the cause in the pastInquire how the client lives now

Phenomenology is not a technique but a way of being with the client: openly, without preconceptions, with the readiness to be surprised.

The four dimensions of existenceUmwelt, Mitwelt, Eigenwelt, Überwelt — a map of the client's life-world

PHYSICAL DIMENSION (UMWELT)

"How do you treat your body? How does your body treat you?"
bodyhealthenvironmentnaturethingshomesafetymortality
  • Relationship with the body — illness, aging, physical sensations
  • Relationship with the world of things — home, money, possessions, food
  • Relationship with nature — the sense of being rooted or estranged
  • Polarity: comfort ↔ discomfort, health ↔ illness, life ↔ death
"Where in your body lives what you are talking about right now?"
"How safe do you feel in the world — physically?"

✅ Begin with the Umwelt if the client is "in the head" — the body grounds them.

"You speak a lot about thoughts. And what is your body saying right now?"

SOCIAL DIMENSION (MITWELT)

"How do you feel among people? What place do you take in the world of others?"
relationshipsbelongingrolespowerloveconflictloneliness
  • Relationships with others — closeness, distance, dependence, dominance
  • Social roles — who the client is for others
  • Polarity: belonging ↔ rejection, closeness ↔ isolation, love ↔ hate
"Who are you when you are with others? Who are you when you are alone?"
"What do you get from these relationships? What do you pay?"

✅ Inquire not only into the problematic but also into the nourishing relationships.

PERSONAL DIMENSION (EIGENWELT)

"Who do you take yourself to be? Who do you want to be?"
identityself-esteemcharacterthe pastmemoryselfhood
  • Relationship with the self — self-esteem, self-understanding, inner dialogue
  • Strengths and weaknesses — what the client acknowledges and what they reject in themselves
  • Polarity: strength ↔ weakness, self-knowledge ↔ self-deception, wholeness ↔ fragmentation
"How would you describe yourself in one sentence?"
"What do you know about yourself for sure? And what do you doubt?"
"This is an important admission. Let us look — who were you before? Who did you stop being?"

SPIRITUAL DIMENSION (ÜBERWELT)

"What do you believe in? What is truly important to you?"
valuesmeaningfaithidealsworldviewpurposecalling
  • Relationship with the unknown — faith, meaning, values, vocation
  • Worldview — a picture of the world, beliefs about how life is arranged
  • Polarity: meaning ↔ absurdity, hope ↔ despair, purpose ↔ emptiness
"For the sake of what do you live? What lies behind your everyday tasks?"
"Which values are you not ready to betray — under any circumstances?"

✅ Überwelt is often the least explored dimension. The sense of meaning lives precisely here.

⚠️ Do not confuse the spiritual with the religious — everyone has values.

Van Deurzen: "The therapist must be able to move through all four dimensions — like through the rooms of the house in which the client lives."

The phenomenological methodFour steps: description → horizontalization → equalization → verification

STEP 1: DESCRIPTION

"Describe what you are experiencing. Do not explain — just describe."
  • The client describes their experience as it is
  • The therapist does not rush to understand listens and clarifies
  • The aim is to get the most concrete picture
"Tell me in more detail. What does it look like? What do you feel at this moment?"
"When you say 'bad' — what exactly does it mean for you?"

✅ Ask "what" and "how" questions, not "why".

⚠️ Do not interpret at this step — just gather the description.

STEP 2: HORIZONTALIZATION

"Let us look at everything you described without a hierarchy — every detail can turn out to be important."
  • All elements of experience are equally valuable — until we know what is the main thing
  • The therapist sets aside their assumptions (epoché)
  • Every detail deserves attention: thought, feeling, sensation, image
"You mentioned several things. Let us not decide right away which of them is more important."

Horizontalization is the deliberate refusal of the "filter of significance". We do not know in advance where the key is hiding.

STEP 3: EQUALIZATION

  • We treat the client's experience without privilege — no theme is more important than another
  • We identify hidden themes — what the client skips or minimizes
  • We look for patterns — recurring ways of being in the world
"I noticed that you briefly mentioned ___. I am curious — what is behind that?"
"Is there something you have not said but that is also present?"

STEP 4: VERIFICATION

"Do I understand correctly that for you it looks like this: ..?"
  • We check the understanding with the client — we do not impose our view
  • The client is the expert of their own experience
  • The therapist may be wrong — and that is fine
"This is my impression. Does it match yours?"
"Correct me if I have not understood it right."

✅ Verification is a defense against the therapist's projection.

✅ Each "check" deepens the contact.

Working with paradoxesLife is full of contradictions — we do not solve them, we learn to live with them

PRINCIPLE

"Life is full of contradictions. Perhaps your task is not to choose one side, but to hold both."

✅ A paradox is not a problem to be solved, but a tension we have to learn to live with

✅ Each dimension of being holds its own polarities

⚠️ Do not rush to "resolve" the contradiction be in it with the client

KEY PARADOXES

Life ↔ Death

"You are afraid of dying. And how are you living — right now?"

The awareness of death can awaken to a fuller life.

Freedom ↔ Necessity

"You feel trapped. And at the same time — you are here, by your own choice."

Closeness ↔ Loneliness

"You want to be closer to people, but you are afraid of losing yourself. How do you usually solve this task?"

Meaning ↔ Absurdity

"Sometimes everything seems meaningless. And at the same time you keep searching — that also says something, doesn't it?"

Knowing ↔ The unknown

"You want certainty. And what if life gives no guarantees?"

WORKING WITH POLARITIES

1. Name both sides of the polarity 2. Inquire — how does the client usually cope with this tension? 3. Check — has the client got stuck on one pole? 4. Help find a dynamic balance — not a choice, but a movement between

"I understand the wish for certainty. But what if the answer is not 'either/or' but 'both'?"

Van Deurzen: "Wisdom is the capacity to hold the opposites without falling apart."

The emotional compassEmotions as a navigator — what do they point to?

PRINCIPLE

"Your emotions are not a problem. They are a compass that shows what is important to you."

✅ Emotions are not symptoms but indicators of one's relation to life

✅ Each "negative" emotion points to a value that is under threat

⚠️ Do not try to remove the "bad" emotions — help to understand what they are about

PAIRS OF EMOTIONS

Anxiety ↔ Courage

"Anxiety says you have something to lose. What is it?"
"What will require courage of you right now?"

Anxiety is a normal reaction to uncertainty. Courage is not the absence of fear, but the readiness to act despite it.

Despair ↔ Hope

"What is causing despair right now? And is there at least something you still hope for?"

Guilt ↔ Responsibility

"What do you feel guilty for? What does this say about your values?"

Existential guilt is not a neurosis but a signal of unrealized potential.

Anger ↔ Resolve

"What stands behind your anger? What needs to change?"

Envy ↔ Striving

"Whom do you envy? What does this say about what you really want?"

Boredom ↔ Thirst

"If boredom is a signal — what is it about? What is missing for you?"

HOW TO USE

1. Name the emotion — what the client feels 2. Do not remove — accept it as given 3. Inquire — what does this emotion point to? Which value is touched? 4. Find the pair — which "positive" pole hides behind this experience? 5. Action — what is the client ready to do, leaning on this information?

Inquiry into values and worldviewA map of what the client believes in and how they live

VALUES

"What is truly important to you — not what 'should' be important, but what really is?"
  • Declared values — what the client says is important
  • Living values — what the client spends time, energy, money on
  • The gap between them — a source of suffering
"You say family is the main thing. How much time did you spend with your family this week?"
"If an alien were observing your life — what would they decide is important to you?"

✅ Help to see the gap between what the client says and how they live.

⚠️ Do not moralize — just make the gap visible.

WORLDVIEW (WELTANSCHAUUNG)

"How, in your view, is the world arranged? What in life is fair, and what is not?"
beliefsrules of lifeattitudesassumptionsexpectations
  • Basic assumptions — "the world is fair", "people are good", "I must control"
  • Hidden rules — unspoken "musts" and "must-nots"
  • Rigidity vs. flexibility — to what extent the client can revise their picture of the world
"Which rules of life have you taken in? Where did they come from? Do they work now?"
"What will happen if the world is not arranged the way you think?"

MAPPING THE LIFE-WORLD

1. Walk through the four dimensions — how the client lives in each 2. Identify the values — in each dimension 3. Find the conflicts — between the dimensions, between the values 4. Discover the blind spots — which dimension is being ignored? 5. Inquire into the dynamics — where is the client moving? Where do they want to go?

"Recall a moment when you felt truly alive. What were you doing? With whom were you?"

Van Deurzen: "We cannot live without a worldview. The question is whether we are aware of it."

Phenomenological Method (Epoché, Description, Equalization, Horizontalization)Phenomenological Method (Epoché, Description, Equalization, Horizontalization)

Van Deurzen's basic toolkit: the therapist deliberately "brackets" their own assumptions, theories, and interpretations in order to meet the client's reality directly. The aim is to describe, not to explain: client and therapist together inquire into the experience without pinning cause-and-effect labels on it. Equalization assumes equal attention to everything heard; horizontalization places each element on the "horizon" of meaning without an imposed hierarchy. The method is not a technique for one session, but a constant discipline of the therapist's presence.

  • 1. Epoché (bracketing) — notice and set aside your own preconceptions, diagnostic categories, and theoretical expectations
  • 2. Description — invite the client to describe the experience as precisely as possible, without explanations and cause-and-effect interpretations: "describe, do not explain"
  • 3. Equalization — give equal attention to everything in the field: do not single one thing out as important and another as insignificant
  • 4. Horizontalization — place what is heard on the "horizon" of context, without imposing a hierarchy of meanings
  • 5. Verification — give the client back their own words: "You are saying that." — check whether the meaning has been understood correctly

When to use:

  • At the start of work with a new client — to establish the phenomenological stance
  • At any turning point when the therapist notices that they are starting to interpret rather than hear
  • When working with a culturally or existentially unfamiliar world of the client
  • When the client speaks of an event the therapist already "knows how to explain"
  • When strong assumptions or diagnostic impulses arise in the therapist

Key phrases:

Tell me what it looks like from your side — not why this is happening, but how exactly it is experienced by you.

Follow-up questions:

What exactly do you notice in this situation — how does it look from inside?
I want to make sure I understand correctly — do you mean.?
What else is present in this experience that we have not yet named?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The phenomenological stance is a constant discipline, not a one-off move: a therapist who "switches it off" mid-session unnoticed begins to project
  • ⚠️ The method does not mean passivity — the therapist actively inquires together with the client, asking clarifying questions
  • ⚠️ Do not confuse with absence of structure: epoché requires high awareness, not just silent listening

van Deurzen E. 2002, 2012; van Deurzen & Arnold-Baker, 2022

Four Worlds Mapping (Umwelt–Mitwelt–Eigenwelt–Überwelt)Four Worlds Mapping (Umwelt–Mitwelt–Eigenwelt–Überwelt)

A systemic way of inquiring into the whole of the client's life through four interconnected dimensions of existence: the physical world (Umwelt), the social (Mitwelt), the personal (Eigenwelt), and the spiritual (Überwelt). Van Deurzen developed this model in the 1970s while working in the psychiatric hospitals of France. Each dimension contains its own challenges, values, and polarities. The tool helps the therapist and the client to see the whole picture of life as a whole — where there is support, and where the client is stuck or avoiding.

  • 1. Introduce the client to the notion of the four dimensions as a map of their existence — without academic terms, in their own language
  • 2. Offer to inquire into each world in turn: physical (body, health), social (relationships), personal (inner world), spiritual (meaning, values)
  • 3. Identify where the client is stuck or is avoiding some dimension
  • 4. Find tensions between the worlds (for example: the body needs rest, the social world demands presence)
  • 5. Build a whole picture: what works well in each world, what needs attention

When to use:

  • During the initial inquiry into the client's situation — "where does it hurt?"
  • In a crisis, when it is unclear in which dimension of life the problem has arisen
  • When working with life transitions and revaluations of life
  • When the client describes a symptom but does not see its context
  • In long-term therapy — as a periodic "map" of changes

Key phrases:

Let us look at your life from different sides. How are things now with your body, health, physical well-being?

Follow-up questions:

How are things in your important relationships — what is there now?
What gives meaning to what you do?
In which of these dimensions do you feel most alive? Most foreign?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The four worlds are not a checklist to fill in within one session; they are a guide for long-term inquiry
  • ⚠️ Do not impose Heidegger's terms on the client — use their own language and images
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into a questionnaire: each dimension requires a living dialogue, not answers to a list of questions

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012

Anxiety as Existential SignalAnxiety as Existential Signal

Van Deurzen sees anxiety not as a symptom to be removed but as a signal pointing to an important life choice or the need for change. Anxiety is "the normal price for human freedom" and a sensitivity to reality. The task of therapy is to help the client hear what anxiety is saying, not to silence it. A distinction is made between basic existential anxiety (ontological, not removable) and neurotic anxiety (defensive, signaling avoidance).

  • 1. Accept the anxiety without trying to soothe or explain it at once — create space for its presence
  • 2. Inquire into the context: when exactly does the anxiety appear, what precedes it, in which dimension of life it arises
  • 3. Ask the question: what is this anxiety calling for? What wants to be heard?
  • 4. Distinguish existential anxiety (ontological — not removable) from neurotic anxiety (defensive, signaling avoidance)
  • 5. Help the client "face" what the anxiety is signaling — a choice, a given, a change

When to use:

  • With complaints of anxiety, panic attacks, anxious states
  • At moments of life transitions, when the client stands before a choice
  • When important topics are being avoided in therapy
  • When the client wants to "just get rid of" the anxiety — as a step toward reframing
  • In an existential crisis accompanied by anxiety

Key phrases:

What would it be if anxiety could speak — what would it tell you? What is it warning you about right now?

Follow-up questions:

What in your life now requires your attention and your choice?
What would it be if you did not try to remove this anxiety, but listened to it?
When exactly does it appear — what is happening in your life in those moments?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not apply this approach in acute clinical anxiety without prior stabilization of the state
  • ⚠️ Anxiety as a signal is not a universal frame; sometimes direct support and reassurance are required, not inquiry
  • ⚠️ Do not force the meeting with the source of the anxiety — the client must be ready

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2015; Heidegger via van Deurzen

Emotional Compass MappingEmotional Compass Mapping

Van Deurzen developed four "compasses" — one for each dimension of existence. Emotions are seen as pointers to values: what is loved, what is under threat, what is lost. Shame, envy, hope point to a desired value; love, joy, pride — to a value possessed; jealousy, anger — to a value under threat; fear, grief — to a value being lost. Emotion is not a "symptom" but a navigational instrument.

  • 1. Accept the client's emotion without evaluating it as "good" or "bad"
  • 2. Ask: which value does this emotion point to?
  • 3. Identify the direction: is the client moving toward the value or away from it? Is the value desired, possessed, under threat, or lost?
  • 4. Inquire what gets in the way of moving toward what is truly important
  • 5. Use the whole spectrum of emotions as a map of the client's orientation in life

When to use:

  • With emotional confusion ("I do not understand what is going on with me")
  • With alexithymia — difficulty naming and recognizing feelings
  • When working with values and meaning
  • When the client experiences "strange" or shameful emotions (envy, jealousy) and does not understand their meaning
  • When emotional contact with one's own needs has been lost

Key phrases:

What does this envy tell you? What does it point to — what is important for you in what the other person has?

Follow-up questions:

When you feel pride — what specifically turns out to be important for you?
This fear — does it speak about something you do not want to lose?
If this emotion is the needle of a compass, in which direction is it pointing?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not rush the "decoding" of emotions — first let them be heard and acknowledged
  • ⚠️ The compass model is a guide, not a rigid scheme; a particular emotion in a particular client may mean something different
  • ⚠️ Do not interpret the emotion for the client — offer a map, do not explain

van Deurzen E. 2002, 2012; van Deurzen & Arnold-Baker, 2022

Exploring Paradoxes and PolaritiesExploring Paradoxes and Polarities

Van Deurzen sees human existence as fundamentally paradoxical: each dimension of life contains irreducible polarities (life/death, freedom/necessity, closeness/loneliness, certainty/doubt). Working with paradox helps the client to find authenticity instead of fixation on one pole. A paradox is not a trap, but a structure that holds both poles of reality and gives greater flexibility and viability.

  • 1. Identify the pole on which the client is "stuck" (for example, only closeness — fear of loneliness)
  • 2. Name both poles: "So for you there is closeness, and there is. what?"
  • 3. Inquire what happens when the client "visits" the other pole: what do they meet there?
  • 4. Help to hold both poles at the same time, without removing the tension between them
  • 5. Find a wider position that includes both poles as part of the fullness of life

When to use:

  • In black-and-white thinking — "either this way or no way"
  • In perfectionism and narcissistic patterns
  • In addictions — fixation on one pole (pleasure without pain)
  • In relationship crises — "either complete merging or rupture"
  • When working with ambivalence and the fear of contradictions

Key phrases:

You say that you only want closeness. And what does the opposite — loneliness — mean for you? Have you ever truly been alone with yourself?

Follow-up questions:

Is it possible at the same time to love a person and be angry with them?
You strive for certainty, avoiding doubts. But what could doubt tell you?
Life contains both these poles. What changes if you stop fighting one of them?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not turn the paradox into abstract philosophy — always come back to the client's concrete experience
  • ⚠️ In acute anxiety, work with paradox requires stability — first stabilization
  • ⚠️ Do not create artificial paradoxes where there are none; follow the client's material

van Deurzen E. 1998/2015 (Paradox and Passion); 2002, 2012

Values and Meaning ClarificationValues and Meaning Clarification

Van Deurzen places central importance on work with values as the foundation of life's meaning. Meaning is not given in advance — it is constructed through clarity about what is truly important. Therapy helps the client move from a vague sense of meaninglessness to a concrete understanding of their commitments and direction. Special attention is paid to the difference between inherited values and those the client has consciously chosen.

  • 1. Inquire what the client calls important, valuable, meaningful — without hasty judgments, through concrete stories
  • 2. Check: does the client's life match the declared values, or is there a gap between them?
  • 3. Find out the hierarchy of values: what is most important if a choice has to be made?
  • 4. Inquire into the source of the values: inherited, chosen, revised, or not yet?
  • 5. Help the client formulate how the values can shape concrete choices and actions in life

When to use:

  • In depression and the sense of meaninglessness
  • In burnout ("I do a lot, but for what?")
  • In midlife crises and life transitions
  • When working with the loss of identity and the sense of "I am not living my own life"
  • In a conflict of values — when important things contradict each other

Key phrases:

What is truly important for you in life — not what should be important, but what is really important right now?

Follow-up questions:

If you knew you had a year left — what would you start doing differently?
Whose values are you carrying — your own or those that were received without your choice?
Where in your life is there a gap between what is important and how you live?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not impose "correct" values on the client — the goal is not the therapist's meaning, but the client's meaning
  • ⚠️ Do not rush: values become clear gradually, through concrete stories, not abstract declarations
  • ⚠️ The gap between values and life is a painful topic; it requires a supportive atmosphere

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012, 2015

Authentic vs Inauthentic Living ExplorationAuthentic vs Inauthentic Living Exploration

Drawing on Heidegger, van Deurzen distinguishes authentic from inauthentic existence. Inauthenticity is "das Man" ("people say so", "everyone does it") — a life lived by someone else's script. This is not a moral flaw but an existential trap in which the person loses authorship of their life. Therapy helps the client distinguish: where they live "their own" life and where they obey outside pressure. Authenticity is understood not as a final state, but as an ongoing process.

  • 1. Inquire into the client's decisions, choices, way of life: which of these did they choose themselves, consciously?
  • 2. Identify "das Man" patterns: "I do this because it is the done thing / everyone does it / my parents said so"
  • 3. Help the client to feel the difference: when do they feel like "themselves" and when do they "play a role"
  • 4. Inquire into the fears connected with an authentic choice: what does the client fear if they "step out of line"
  • 5. Support small steps toward a more authentic life — without revolution, but with a shift

When to use:

  • With the sense "I am not living my own life"
  • When working with perfectionism, people-pleasing, dependence on approval
  • In identity crises — "who am I really?"
  • Under stress from a mismatch with one's own values
  • At pivotal life decisions, where others' expectations are pressing

Key phrases:

Is this your choice or what was expected of you? What happens inside when you do this — do you feel like yourself?

Follow-up questions:

If you did not need to please anyone — what would you choose?
Whose life are you living?
When was the last time you did something because you wanted it — and not because you had to?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The notion of authenticity does not mean selfishness or ignoring others — it is important to convey this distinction
  • ⚠️ Do not create the illusion that the "real me" is some hidden true "self"; authenticity is a process, not a final state
  • ⚠️ The fear of standing out from expectations is a real fear of social exclusion; do not devalue it

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012; Heidegger via van Deurzen

Boundary Situations WorkBoundary Situations Work

The concept is borrowed from Jaspers and integrated by van Deurzen into the existential approach. Boundary situations (Grenzsituationen) are experiences in which the limits of human existence are laid bare: serious illness, the death of someone close, a catastrophe, prison. Van Deurzen sees them as potential breakthrough points: a crisis can lay bare what is truly important. Meeting a boundary situation is a painful but possible path toward authenticity.

  • 1. Accept the client's boundary situation without trying to "normalize" it or downplay the weight of what happened
  • 2. Help the client to face fully what has happened or is happening — without going around it, without softening
  • 3. Inquire: what does this situation open up about the client's life, about their values, about what is really important?
  • 4. Find the client's resources: what helped to bear the limit situations earlier?
  • 5. Inquire what new meaning or orientation is possible after this situation — without forcing

When to use:

  • When working with severe loss, a diagnosis, catastrophic events
  • In an existential crisis caused by meeting the limits of life
  • With suicidal thoughts — observing safety protocols
  • When experiencing the consequences of violence or moral devastation
  • After coming out of an acute crisis — for the integration of the experience

Key phrases:

You have been through something very hard. What did this change in you — in what you consider important?

Follow-up questions:

What is the most important thing you understood about life through what happened?
Sometimes the hardest moments open up something we had not thought of. What did this open for you?
How did you manage to bear this — what held you?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ A boundary situation is not a tool for "fast growth"; do not rush the meaning-making
  • ⚠️ First, the full acknowledgment of the weight of what happened — inquiry into meaning only after
  • ⚠️ In acute trauma — support and stabilization come before existential inquiry

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012; Jaspers via van Deurzen

Relational World Exploration (Mitwelt Work)Relational World Exploration (Mitwelt Work)

The social dimension (Mitwelt — "being-with-others") holds a special place for van Deurzen. She inquires how the client builds and experiences relationships: where they are rooted in belonging, where they experience loneliness, where they "lose themselves" for the sake of another. The therapeutic relationship itself becomes living material for inquiry — as a model of how the client is present in relationships in general. Special attention is paid to existential loneliness as the basis of authentic closeness.

  • 1. Inquire into the client's important relationships: with whom they are close, with whom in conflict, whom they avoid
  • 2. Identify patterns: how does the client "enter" relationships? What do they expect? What do they fear?
  • 3. Inquire into the balance between closeness and autonomy: where do they lose themselves, where do they withdraw to the point of isolation
  • 4. Use the therapeutic relationship as living material: "What is happening between us right now?"
  • 5. Inquire into existential loneliness: the capacity to be with oneself as the basis of authentic closeness with another

When to use:

  • With difficulties in relationships — conflicts, ruptures, misunderstandings
  • With loneliness and social isolation
  • With dependent patterns — merging, loss of self
  • When working with ruptures and the loss of relationships
  • When the therapeutic relationship reproduces the client's patterns

Key phrases:

Who is important for you in life? What do these relationships give you — and what do they require of you?

Follow-up questions:

Where in relationships do you feel that you lose yourself?
What happens for you when you are completely alone?
What is happening between us at this moment — do you notice it?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Work with relationships in existential therapy differs from psychodynamic work: the focus is not on transference as such, but on how relationships reveal the client's worldview
  • ⚠️ Be careful with interpretations of the therapeutic relationship — they must be phenomenologically grounded, not imposed
  • ⚠️ Do not force work with existential loneliness — it requires significant trust

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012

Structural Existential Analysis (SEA)Structural Existential Analysis (SEA)

A methodology developed by van Deurzen since the 1970s and formalized in 2022 with Arnold-Baker. SEA uses five "lenses" for the systematic analysis of life experience: Space, Time, Purpose, Paradox, Passion. It includes the Existential Research Dialogue (ERD) as a dialogical interview technique. It is applicable both therapeutically — for building an "existential portrait" of the client — and for research purposes.

  • 1. Gather phenomenological material through the client's free description — without a foreknown direction
  • 2. Apply each lens in turn: Space — where is the client? Time — how are they oriented? Purpose — where are they moving? Paradox — what holds them? Passion — what is alive?
  • 3. Find the intersections between the lenses: where Time affects Purpose, where Paradox is linked with Space
  • 4. Build a coherent "existential portrait" of the client
  • 5. Give this understanding back to the client as a tool of self-knowledge — not as a diagnosis, but as a map

When to use:

  • In long-term therapy, when significant material has accumulated
  • When working with life crises that require a systemic view
  • When there is a need to integrate scattered material into a unified picture
  • When the direction has been lost in therapy — as a structural overview
  • When working with life transitions and revaluations of life

Key phrases:

If you look at your situation through different "lenses" — through where you are, where you are moving, what inspires you — what emerges?

Follow-up questions:

What inspires you most in life right now? Where is your passion?
Where are you — spatially, psychologically, in life?
What holds you back from moving where you want to go?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ SEA is a systematic method that requires therapist training; do not apply mechanically as a checklist
  • ⚠️ The lenses are not a mandatory order, but flexible foci; follow the client's material
  • ⚠️ The method is for long-term therapy; in short-term — use individual lenses selectively

van Deurzen E. & Arnold-Baker C. 2022

Socratic Dialogue / Philosophical InquirySocratic Dialogue / Philosophical Inquiry

Van Deurzen was deeply influenced by Plato and Socrates. Therapy in her understanding is a joint philosophical inquiry, a dialogue of two people trying to make sense of what is right, what is true, what is important. The therapist takes the position of sincere not-knowing — not an expert with answers, but a "midwife of thought" (after Socrates). Direct clarifying questions, an honest pointing-out of contradictions, joint thinking — the main tools of this approach.

  • 1. Take the position of sincere not-knowing: the therapist does not know the answer in advance — they honestly inquire together with the client
  • 2. Ask clarifying questions that help the client clarify their own thought
  • 3. When needed — point to contradictions in the client's words directly and without judgment
  • 4. Jointly inquire into the consequences of a belief or choice: "If this is so, what follows from it?"
  • 5. Arrive at a clearer, more considered understanding — not at a "correct answer", but at greater transparency for the client themselves

When to use:

  • When working with beliefs, values, moral dilemmas
  • When working with intellectually oriented clients
  • When the client gets stuck in circular reasoning
  • When the client declares a belief without noticing its inner contradictions
  • When working with sedimented beliefs and worldview

Key phrases:

Help me understand — when you say this, what exactly do you mean? I want to make sure I understand correctly.

Follow-up questions:

If you believe this, what follows from it?
Earlier you said one thing, and now another — how do these two statements fit together?
I am not sure I understand. Can we inquire into this together?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The Socratic dialogue must not turn into an intellectual fight or a sense that the client is being "caught out" on contradictions
  • ⚠️ The spirit is joint honest inquiry, not a debate; if that spirit is lost — stop
  • ⚠️ With emotional vulnerability — first support, dialogue later

van Deurzen E. 2002, 2012, 2015; Plato/Socrates via van Deurzen

Working with Mortality and FinitudeWorking with Mortality and Finitude

In the physical dimension (Umwelt), death holds a central place. Van Deurzen sees the awareness of mortality not as a pathology but as a necessary condition of an authentic life. Heidegger's "Sein-zum-Tode" (being-toward-death) is interpreted by her as a call to live more consciously. Therapy helps the client to "meet" finitude and to use that awareness as a "clarifying lens" focusing on what is truly important.

  • 1. Create a safe space for a conversation about death — one's own and that of others, without an anxious rush
  • 2. Inquire into the client's relationship to their own mortality: avoidance, fear, denial, acceptance
  • 3. Inquire how the awareness of finitude affects the way the client lives life now
  • 4. Help to use the awareness of death as a "clarifying lens": what is truly important given finitude?
  • 5. Inquire into "small deaths": losses, partings, endings — as a practice of working with finitude

When to use:

  • With the fear of death — one's own or that of close ones
  • When working with a serious diagnosis or an incurable illness
  • After the loss of close ones — in grief work
  • With the sense of meaninglessness and "what is it all for"
  • When working with elderly clients — taking stock

Key phrases:

How do you think about your own mortality? Do you think about it at all — or do you try not to think about it?

Follow-up questions:

If you knew you had little time left — what would change in your life?
What does the fear of death tell you about what you value?
We lose something all the time — people, opportunities, versions of ourselves. How do you live through these "small deaths"?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Direct work with mortality requires significant trust in the therapeutic relationship — do not force it
  • ⚠️ With suicidal thoughts — safety protocols come first; this technique is not applicable without prior risk assessment
  • ⚠️ Do not force "acceptance of death" — it is a long and very personal process

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012; Heidegger via van Deurzen

Überwelt Exploration / Spiritual Dimension WorkÜberwelt Exploration / Spiritual Dimension Work

Überwelt (the over-world / spiritual dimension) is the "quietest" and often least explored dimension in van Deurzen. It includes religious and spiritual beliefs, moral values, ideals, the sense of belonging to something larger (nature, history, humanity). Van Deurzen treats the spiritual dimension secularly — not as religion, but as a territory of meaning, orientations, and "final questions". Working with Überwelt opens the deepest sources of meaningfulness — or of crisis.

  • 1. Gently introduce the spiritual dimension as one of the areas of life, without assuming the client's religiosity
  • 2. Inquire: what does the client orient to as a "final" reference point? God, nature, reason, family, science?
  • 3. Inquire into the sense of belonging to something larger than oneself — is there one?
  • 4. Identify the client's moral compass: what is for them the basis of "right/wrong"?
  • 5. Inquire how the spiritual dimension supports the client — or limits them when a former belief has been lost

When to use:

  • In an existential crisis and the loss of meaning
  • With the loss of faith — religious or secular
  • When working with questions of meaning and mission
  • After major life changes that have destroyed former points of reference
  • With moral dilemmas and conflicts of values

Key phrases:

Is there something that gives meaning to your life beyond the everyday — something you belong to or feel part of?

Follow-up questions:

What do you lean on when everything is collapsing?
What is for you a "final" reference point — not "what is right by the rules", but what is right for you?
What do you feel yourself a part of?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ The spiritual dimension is not a territory for interpreting the client's beliefs; the therapist must work with religious and atheist clients with the same respect
  • ⚠️ Do not impose "spirituality" as a value; for some clients this dimension does not resonate — that needs to be accepted
  • ⚠️ The loss of spiritual reference points can be very painful — it requires care, not rationalization

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012

Worldview Mapping / Existential CompassWorldview Mapping / Existential Compass

A systematic inquiry into the client's basic beliefs about themselves, the world, other people, and the future. Van Deurzen sees worldview as an "orientation" — the way in which a person is "directed" in the world. The compass helps to see in which direction the client is "looking": what they consider possible or impossible, who they see themselves as, and what they expect from others. The map of worldview often reveals hidden beliefs that shape chronic patterns.

  • 1. Inquire into basic attitudes toward the self: "What do you think about yourself as a person?"
  • 2. Inquire into attitudes toward other people: "What can you expect from others?"
  • 3. Inquire into attitudes toward the world as a whole: "What is this world — safe, hostile, unpredictable?"
  • 4. Inquire into attitudes toward the future: "What awaits you ahead?"
  • 5. Help the client to see the coherence of these attitudes as a whole position in the world — and to recognize it as one of the possible ones, not the only one

When to use:

  • When working with chronic patterns ("it always works out this way")
  • With depressive beliefs and a sense of hopelessness
  • With recurring life situations
  • In the middle of therapy, when enough material has accumulated for analysis
  • In identity crises and the questions "who am I?"

Key phrases:

If you think about the world as a whole — what does it look like to you? Not how it should be, but how you really perceive it?

Follow-up questions:

What do you think about people in general — can they be trusted?
What do you think you can rely on in life?
This idea about yourself — where does it come from? Did you always think this way?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ A worldview is shaped over years and does not change quickly — do not expect quick results
  • ⚠️ The aim is not to "fix" beliefs but to make them aware as one of the possible positions, not the only truth
  • ⚠️ Do not interpret the client's beliefs for them — it is important that they themselves formulate and recognize them

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002; van Deurzen & Arnold-Baker, 2022

Confronting Existential GivensConfronting Existential Givens

Van Deurzen follows the existential-philosophical tradition, viewing death, freedom, loneliness, and meaninglessness as irreducible "givens" of human existence. Psychological growth is linked not with avoiding these givens but with developing a conscious relation to them. Crises are seen as potential breakthrough points: "a crisis is a possible breakthrough". A meeting with a given activates existential anxiety right in the session.

  • 1. Identify which given the client has met or is actively avoiding meeting
  • 2. Create space for naming it directly — without softening or evasive maneuvers
  • 3. Inquire how the client has so far coped with this given: avoidance, rationalization, acceptance
  • 4. Help to find a new, more conscious relation: not resignation, but integration — the ability to hold the given as part of life
  • 5. Inquire what opens in the client's life when they stop spending energy on avoidance

When to use:

  • When working with loss, severe illness, an existential crisis
  • With the fear of death — one's own or close ones'
  • With the experience of meaninglessness and depressive hopelessness
  • With the avoidance of responsibility and shifting the authorship of one's life
  • With existential loneliness and isolation

Key phrases:

It looks as if you have long been avoiding meeting what frightens you most. What would happen if you looked at it directly?

Follow-up questions:

You say everything is meaningless. What would have to be there for life to gain meaning?
The awareness that everything will one day end — how does that change the way you live today?
No one can live this for you. How are you with that?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Confrontation with the givens must be timely — the client must be in a sufficiently stable state
  • ⚠️ Do not turn it into a philosophical lecture — the givens are named only when the client has already come close to them
  • ⚠️ With suicidal thoughts — observe safety protocols; confrontation with the givens does not replace crisis intervention

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012, 2015

Sedimented Beliefs ExplorationSedimented Beliefs Exploration

"Sedimented" beliefs are notions accumulated over the course of life and hardened to the state of "taken for granted". They are no longer recognized as beliefs but are perceived as facts of reality. Van Deurzen sees them as obstacles to authentic choice and flexibility. The therapeutic task is to "soften the sediment", giving back to the client the authorship of their views and opening up the possibility of other ways of understanding the world.

  • 1. Identify beliefs the client presents as "obvious facts" ("people always betray", "I am not worthy of love")
  • 2. Phenomenologically inquire: when did this belief arise? How was it formed? Who "passed it on"?
  • 3. Pose the question: "Is this a truth about the world or your interpretation of experience?"
  • 4. Inquire into exceptions: is there experience that does not fit this belief?
  • 5. Help the client to hold the belief as one of the possible positions, not as the only reality

When to use:

  • With chronic patterns ("it has always been this way")
  • With rigid beliefs about the self, people, the world
  • When working with schemas and early decisions
  • When the client presents an opinion as a fact without noticing it
  • When stuck in repeating situations

Key phrases:

You say that people always leave. Is this what you discovered in your experience, or what you began to expect?

Follow-up questions:

When did you first realize that things were exactly this way for you? Who taught you to think about yourself like this?
Have there been moments in your life when this belief was not confirmed?
If you were not certain of this — how would you act then?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Working with sedimented beliefs takes time and trust — do not force it
  • ⚠️ A direct "analysis" of beliefs without phenomenological ground can feel like an attack on the client
  • ⚠️ Do not rush to refute — first understand which protective function the belief was serving

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002; Merleau-Ponty via van Deurzen

Temporal Orientation ExplorationTemporal Orientation Exploration

Van Deurzen uses Heidegger's concept of temporality: the human being exists at the same time in three temporal horizons (past–present–future), and each of them shapes the experience of life. Clients often "get stuck" in one time: in the past (depression, guilt), in the future (anxiety), or avoid the present. The aim is to restore a full three-dimensional existence in time as a single life story.

  • 1. Inquire in which time the client "lives" predominantly: past, present, or future?
  • 2. Inquire into the past: what is the client carrying with them? What was there? What of it still shapes their life?
  • 3. Inquire into the present: how does the client experience "now"? Are they present in their own life?
  • 4. Inquire into the future: how does it appear to them? What is possible? What frightens them in it?
  • 5. Help to find the link between the three times as a single life story — not a fragmented one, but a coherent one

When to use:

  • In depression — getting stuck in the past, guilt, rumination
  • In anxiety — getting stuck in the future, avoiding the present
  • With a sense of meaninglessness — the absence of an image of the future
  • When working with grief and loss
  • When the client "lives" in memories or constantly worries about the future

Key phrases:

When you think about the past — what do you carry with you from there? And how does it influence the way you live now?

Follow-up questions:

How do you experience what is happening right now — are you here?
When you look into the future — what do you see? What is possible for you?
If your past, present, and future could speak — what would they argue about?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not turn the work with time into an exercise in "positive thinking" about the future
  • ⚠️ The aim is not to make the client "think optimistically" but to restore access to all three horizons as real parts of life
  • ⚠️ Getting stuck in the past first requires acknowledgment of the experience, not an immediate "switch" to the present

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002, 2012; Heidegger via van Deurzen

Being-in-the-World Analysis (Dasein-Analysis)Being-in-the-World Analysis (Dasein-Analysis)

Drawing on Heidegger ("Dasein" = being-in-the-world), van Deurzen sees the human not as an isolated subject but as a being inseparable from their world. "Being-in-the-world" is always already thrown, projecting, and being-with-others. The analysis helps to understand how exactly the client "is" in their world: what was given to them without choice, where they are going, and where they get lost in everydayness.

  • 1. Inquire into "thrownness": into what world was the client "thrown"? Family, culture, body, historical time
  • 2. Inquire into the "project": where is the client going? How do they see their future, their direction?
  • 3. Inquire into "falling": how does the client "lose themselves" in everydayness, in others' expectations and habits?
  • 4. Help to see the wholeness: thrownness + project + everydayness = their concrete being
  • 5. Inquire: where can the client take responsibility for their being, despite the thrownness

When to use:

  • When working with the feeling "I do not understand who I am"
  • In identity crises
  • With the sense of being estranged from one's own life
  • When inquiring into deep existential questions in long-term therapy
  • When working with the influence of family and culture on life choices

Key phrases:

Into what world were you born — what was given to you without your choice? How did this shape you as a person?

Follow-up questions:

Where are you going — what is your project, your striving in life?
Where do you feel that you "get lost" in others' expectations or habits?
What of what was given to you have you accepted as your own — and what do you want to revise?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Heideggerian concepts are not explained to the client in Heidegger's terms — they are used by the therapist as an inner frame
  • ⚠️ The client speaks about their life in their own words; the therapist's task is to see through this analysis, not to expound it
  • ⚠️ Do not impose a "project" — it must arise from within, not be offered by the therapist

van Deurzen E. 1997, 2002; Heidegger via van Deurzen

ALLIANCE

FOCUS

INTERVENTIONS

PRESENCE

CLOSING

🔧 Adapted diary
This approach does not define a standardized client diary. We prepared an adapted version based on its key concepts. If you have suggestions, write to us.
Dimensions Diary

Deurzen's approach explores life through four dimensions of being.

By noticing each dimension, you see life as a whole.

Record the situation → physical → social → personal → spiritual.

Materials are informational and educational and summarize publicly available scientific sources. They are not medical or psychological advice, are not intended for self-diagnosis or self-treatment, and do not replace consultation with a qualified professional.