← Library

Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

STPP
«Brevity is not a compromise, but a focus: find the core conflict and work with it.»
Definition

STPP (Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy) is a family of time-limited psychodynamic approaches, usually 16-25 sessions, focused on one central conflict. The key idea is that deep psychodynamic change can occur in a brief format when the therapist identifies the focus accurately and works with it through transference, defense, affect, and interpretation.

Founder(s) and history

STPP is not one method but several parallel developments united by a shared question: can psychodynamic therapy be shorter and still be deep?

David Malan (1924-2018), a British therapist at the Tavistock Clinic, developed the model of the two triangles that became the navigation system for brief dynamic therapy. The triangle of conflict (feeling-anxiety-defense) and the triangle of person (current relationships-transference-past) help the therapist locate both the process and the relational field. His central works include The Frontier of Brief Psychotherapy (1976) and Individual Psychotherapy and the Science of Psychodynamics (1979).

Lester Luborsky (1920-2010), a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, developed the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) method: Wish (W), Response of Other (RO), and Response of Self (RS). It gave clinicians and researchers a standardized way to identify the client's repeated relational theme.

Hans Strupp (1921-2006) developed Time-Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy (TLDP / TIME-UP), a 25-session model emphasizing the alliance and cyclical maladaptive patterns. Peter Sifneos (1920-2008) developed Short-Term Anxiety-Provoking Psychotherapy (STAPP), an early model using anxiety as a motivator for change.

By the 1990s and 2000s STPP had accumulated enough evidence to enter clinical guidelines, including NICE recommendations for depression.

Key concepts

Focus

The defining feature of STPP is focus. In the first sessions therapist and client identify one central conflict. The focus is not merely a topic of conversation; it is an unconscious pattern that appears across relationships. Material that does not belong to the focus is gently but consistently brought back to it.

Triangle of conflict

Malan's triangle of conflict contains Feeling / Wish (W), Anxiety (A), and Defense (D). A wish or feeling approaches awareness, anxiety signals danger, and defense pushes the feeling away. The therapist helps the client see the sequence: W -> A -> D -> symptom.

Triangle of person

The same conflict appears in Current relationships (C), Transference (T), and Past / Object relationships (O/P). A linking interpretation connects these arenas: what happens with a partner or colleague is also happening with the therapist and has roots in earlier attachment figures.

CCRT

Luborsky's CCRT describes the repeated relational pattern through three elements:

  • W (Wish): what the client wants from others.
  • RO (Response of Other): how others typically respond or are expected to respond.
  • RS (Response of Self): how the client reacts in response.

The therapist gathers relationship episodes, identifies W, RO, and RS in each, and formulates the repeated theme.

Therapeutic alliance

In STPP the alliance is not background. It is an active tool. Strupp showed that alliance quality in the early sessions predicts outcome. Because the therapy is brief, the therapist must be warm, structured, and transparent from the beginning.

Time limit

The time limit is not merely an administrative boundary. It activates themes of separation, dependency, loss, and autonomy. Termination work begins before the final session and becomes part of the treatment.

Therapy format
  • Course length: usually 16-25 sessions; some protocols use 12, and more complex cases may require up to 40.
  • Frequency: usually once weekly.
  • Session length: 45-50 minutes.
  • Setting: face to face or secure online work.
  • Therapist style: more active and directive than classical analysis, but usually less confrontational than ISTDP.
  • Structure: assessment sessions (1-3), focus formulation, work with the focus, and termination work in the final third.
Evidence base
  • Driessen et al. (2013): meta-analysis comparing STPP and CBT for depression found practically no meaningful difference (effect size about -0.03).
  • Abbass et al. (2014): meta-analysis found STPP effective for depression (d = 0.60-0.84), anxiety (d = 0.68), psychosomatic presentations (d = 1.28), and interpersonal conflicts (d = 0.75).
  • Leichsenring et al. (2004): meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials supported STPP for depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders.
  • Knekt et al. (2008): the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study found that clients receiving STPP often continued to improve after therapy ended, and three-year outcomes could become comparable to longer treatment.
  • NICE guidelines: STPP is included in UK clinical guidance for depression.

A valuable STPP finding is the post-treatment growth curve: clients may continue using internalized insights after the formal therapy ends.

Limitations

STPP requires a good candidate: psychological mindedness, motivation, a specific trigger, capacity for attachment, and an alliance that forms early. Contraindications include active substance misuse, acute suicidality, psychosis, lack of motivation, and inability to form a therapeutic relationship. Severe personality disorders may require adaptation or a longer format. The method works with one central focus; clients with many unstable problems may need broader care. The quality of formulation is decisive: a poorly chosen focus leads to unproductive work. Termination must be worked through, usually across the final third of therapy. Clients with chronic maladaptive patterns lasting more than five years may need longer treatment.

Therapist stanceWarm but directive — alongside the client, and leading

Hold the focus. Every drift away may be a defense, not a new topic. Gently return to the central conflict.

The triangle of conflict is always working: behind symptom is feeling, behind feeling is defense, behind defense is a link to the past.

ATTITUDE

"I will be active, ask questions, and share observations. I want us to use our time well."

✅ In STPP the therapist is active, directive, and warm.

✅ The core balance is support plus confrontation.

✅ The focus stays on the central conflict; the session does not wander.

⚠️ Do not retreat into a neutral analytic posture. This is not long-term analysis.

⚠️ Do not avoid confrontation because you fear hurting the client.

Malan's point: an active therapist position is necessary for brief dynamic work. Without it, focus is lost and time disappears.

THREE PILLARS OF STPP

1. Focus — a narrow, clear central conflict. 2. Time — a limit, usually 16-25 sessions, as a motivating factor. 3. Transference — intensive but focused work with the client's relationship to the therapist.

Conflict — defense — transference — time
Assessment and focusSessions 1-3: define the conflict, assess suitability, make a contract

ASSESSING SUITABILITY

"Tell me what brings you now. What changed?"
"Was there a specific moment when things became worse?"

Good prognostic signs in the Malan/Strupp tradition:

  • Psychological mindedness — capacity to reflect on feelings.
  • Motivation — the client comes by choice and wants to understand.
  • Concrete trigger — loss, conflict, transition, or exacerbation.
  • Capacity for alliance — contact can form in the first sessions.
  • At least one meaningful relationship in past or present.
Poor fitGood fit
No concrete problem can be namedA clear trigger and focus are present
No capacity to speak about feelingsSome reflective capacity, even if difficult
No motivation; sent by someone elseComes voluntarily and wants to understand
Severe personality disorganizationNeurotic level of organization

Not every client is a candidate for STPP. This is respect for both the method and the client.

IDENTIFYING THE FOCUS

"If we could work on only one problem, what would it be?"
"What repeats in your relationships — the same scenario you would like to change?"

1. Listen to two or three relationship episodes. 2. Look for repetition: wish, response of other, response of self. 3. Formulate a preliminary CCRT or central conflict. 4. Discuss the focus with the client.

✅ The focus is the red thread through current relationships, the past, and transference.

⚠️ Do not grab the first complaint. Go deeper.

CONTRACT

"We will work for N sessions. Our focus is [conflict formulation]. The time limit is not a punishment; it helps us focus."

Name the number of sessions, formulate the focus in plain language, explain the active format, and make the time limit explicit.

"The time limit helps us not postpone what matters."

The time limit is a therapeutic instrument. It activates separation and loss, often linked to the central conflict.

Triangle of conflictFeeling, defense, anxiety — the map of inner conflict

MALAN'S MODEL

Sequence: Feeling / Wish (W) → Anxiety (A) → Defense (D) → Symptom

  • Feeling / Wish — unconscious need, longing, impulse: closeness, recognition, aggression, dependency.
  • Anxiety — danger signal when the feeling approaches awareness.
  • Defense — the way the feeling is pushed away: intellectualization, denial, somatization, projection.
W → A → D

HOW TO USE IT

"You speak about this very calmly, although something painful happened. What stands behind that calmness?"

1. See the defense — what does the client do in order not to feel?

"I notice you smile while describing the loss. What is behind that smile?"

2. Name the anxiety — what is feared if the feeling is allowed?

"What do you imagine would happen if you felt this?"

3. Reach the feeling — what is actually wanted or avoided?

"What do you really feel toward this person?"

✅ Move from surface to depth: D → A → W.

⚠️ Do not attack the defense. Show it softly and respectfully.

"It seems to me you are reasoning, but not feeling — as if you were speaking about someone else. Do you notice that?"
Triangle of personTransference, current relationships, past: three arenas of one conflict

MODEL

Three arenas of conflict:

  • T (Transference) — what appears in the relationship with the therapist.
  • C (Current) — what repeats in current relationships.
  • O (Other/Object) — where it comes from, usually parental or early figures.
C ← T → O

WORKING WITH TRANSFERENCE

1. Detection — the client is responding to the therapist as to a significant figure.

"It seems you are expecting something from me right now. What exactly?"

2. Demonstration — point it out gently.

"You flinch when I make an observation, as if you expect criticism."

3. Extrapolation — connect it with life and the past.

"This resembles how you describe your reaction to your father, and also what happens with your boss."

4. Resolution — help the client feel the difference.

"But I am not your father. I am here to help. Can you feel that?"

✅ Transference is a powerful STPP tool because the conflict becomes alive in the room.

⚠️ Do not interpret transference too early. Alliance comes first.

INTERPRETATION

Four levels, from simple to deep:

1. Current + defense — "You speak calmly about your wife, but I can see it hurts." 2. Transference — "With me you do the same: you try not to show vulnerability." 3. Genetic link — "This began with a mother who could not tolerate your feelings." 4. Full interpretation — C ← T → O in one statement.

"With your wife you defend by silence (C), just as you become silent when I ask a difficult question (T). Both patterns come from your relationship with a mother who could not bear your feelings (O)."

A full interpretation is the peak of STPP work. Do not rush it; it must grow from joint exploration.

CCRT — defining the central themeLuborsky's method: from relationship stories to conflict formula

CCRT STRUCTURE

  • W (Wish) — what the client wants from others: to be heard, accepted, free, cared for.
  • RO (Response of Other) — how others usually respond or are expected to respond: reject, control, ignore, criticize.
  • RS (Response of Self) — how the client responds: withdraws, becomes angry, feels bad, submits.
W → RO → RS

HOW TO IDENTIFY IT

"Tell me about a specific interaction that affected you. Who was there, when, and what happened?"

1. Collect two or three relationship narratives. 2. Code W, RO, and RS in each. 3. Find the repetition. 4. Formulate it and check it with the client.

"Here is what I notice: you long for closeness (W), expect criticism (RO), and then withdraw (RS). Does that sound true?"

EXAMPLE

T: Tell me about the last conflict with your wife. C: I wanted to talk, but she criticized me for being away too much. I went silent and left the room. T: Does something similar happen at work? C: Yes. When my boss points out mistakes, I nod and then stay angry all day. T: And with me? When I ask a question that feels uncomfortable? C: (pause) I think I also go silent. T: Notice the theme: you want to be heard, expect criticism, and close down. With your wife, with your boss, and with me.

CCRT plus Malan's triangle is a strong combination. CCRT identifies the theme; the triangle explains the dynamics.

Intensive workSessions 4-20: deepening, confrontation, insight

CLARIFICATION

"What do you mean by 'he does not understand me'?"
"Describe the exact moment when you felt that."

✅ Specific examples reduce defense and make the conflict visible.

✅ Asking for an example moves the work from abstraction to lived episode.

CONFRONTATION

"You say you love her, and at the same time you avoid calling her. What is behind this contradiction?"
"You pay for therapy, but often arrive late. What do you think that means?"

✅ Confrontation means pointing to contradiction, not attacking the person.

⚠️ Confront the defense, not the client.

FOCUSING

"This is interesting, but let's return to our theme — how you respond to closeness."

✅ Keep returning to the central conflict.

⚠️ Do not let the session drift; time is limited.

EMPATHIC REFLECTION

"That was a very painful situation. I understand why you protected yourself."

✅ The balance is confrontation plus support. One without the other does not work.

Malan's principle: confrontation without empathy is aggression; empathy without confrontation is collusion.

TerminationLast 3-5 sessions: integration, goodbye, independence

WORKING WITH SEPARATION

"We have N sessions left. What do you feel about that?"
"What is it like for you to end our work? Is this feeling familiar?"

✅ Termination is a continuation of the central conflict. How the client says goodbye often shows how they live.

✅ Remind the client of the number of sessions left; the limit is therapeutic.

⚠️ Do not treat termination as a formality. It is deep work.

CONSOLIDATION

1. Review insights — what has the client understood?

"What do you now see in your relationships that you did not see before?"

2. Review transference — what changed in the relationship with the therapist?

"Has anything changed in the way you experience yourself with me?"

3. Plan the future — how will the client respond alone?

"When the familiar pattern begins again, what will you do differently?"

4. Name the possibility of return

"If needed, you can return."

The Helsinki study suggests that STPP clients often keep improving after therapy ends. The time limit can activate internal resources.

Triangle of ConflictTriangle of Conflict

Malan's map of internal conflict: wish or feeling activates anxiety, anxiety activates defense, and defense blocks the feeling while maintaining symptoms.

  • Identify the wish or feeling
  • Track the anxiety signal
  • Name the defense
  • Show the sequence to the client
  • Return to the feeling at a tolerable pace

When to use:

  • When symptoms are linked to avoided affect
  • When the client moves into defense
  • When the therapist needs a simple dynamic formulation

Key phrases:

Here we can see the conflict: feeling, anxiety, and defense.

Follow-up questions:

What feeling is being avoided?
What defense comes in when anxiety rises?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not turn the triangle into a lecture
  • ⚠️ Do not confront defenses without alliance
  • ⚠️ Do not ignore anxiety tolerance

Malan, D. (1979)

Triangle of PersonTriangle of Person

Malan's relational triangle: the same conflict appears in current relationships, transference, and early object relationships.

  • Start from a current episode
  • Notice the same pattern with the therapist
  • Link the pattern to earlier figures
  • Interpret the connection carefully
  • Help the client experience the difference between past and present

When to use:

  • When a repeated relational pattern is clear
  • When transference is active
  • When the client can tolerate linking present and past

Key phrases:

This appears in current relationships, here with me, and in earlier relationships.

Follow-up questions:

What do you expect from me right now?
Who does this remind you of?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not interpret transference too early
  • ⚠️ Do not force childhood links
  • ⚠️ Keep the formulation collaborative

Malan, D. (1979)

Central Focus FormulationCentral Focus Formulation

The early formulation of one central conflict that will organize the whole brief treatment.

  • Collect two or three key episodes
  • Identify the repeated wish, fear, and defense
  • Name the relational pattern in simple language
  • Check the formulation with the client
  • Use it to guide every session

When to use:

  • During assessment
  • When therapy risks becoming unfocused
  • When the client brings many problems that share one pattern

Key phrases:

If we had to name the central pattern, it might be this.

Follow-up questions:

Does this fit your experience?
Where else does this pattern appear?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not choose the first complaint automatically
  • ⚠️ Revise the focus if new evidence contradicts it
  • ⚠️ Avoid abstract formulations the client cannot feel

Malan, D. Luborsky, L. Strupp, H

Trial InterpretationTrial Interpretation

A tentative interpretation offered early to test whether the client can use psychodynamic links without becoming overwhelmed or defensive.

  • Offer a modest link between pattern and feeling
  • Mark it as a hypothesis
  • Observe the client's response
  • Assess insight, anxiety, and alliance
  • Adjust depth and pace accordingly

When to use:

  • During early assessment
  • When testing suitability for STPP
  • When the therapist needs to estimate interpretive capacity

Key phrases:

I wonder whether something similar may be happening here.

Follow-up questions:

Does that feel accurate or not?
What happens in you as I say this?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not present trial interpretations as certainty
  • ⚠️ Watch for shame or collapse
  • ⚠️ Avoid deep genetic interpretations too early

Malan, D. Sifneos, P

Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT)Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT)

Luborsky's structured method for identifying a repeated relationship theme through Wish, Response of Other, and Response of Self.

  • Collect relationship episodes
  • Identify the client's wish in each episode
  • Identify the response of the other
  • Identify the response of self
  • Find the repeated theme
  • Formulate W-RO-RS with the client

When to use:

  • When the client's relational pattern repeats
  • When treatment focus needs empirical grounding
  • When several episodes can be compared

Key phrases:

You want closeness, expect rejection, and then withdraw.

Follow-up questions:

What did you want from them?
How did they respond?
How did you respond?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not reduce the client to a formula
  • ⚠️ Use concrete episodes, not global impressions
  • ⚠️ Check the formulation collaboratively

Luborsky, L. (1984); Luborsky & Crits-Christoph

Linking Interpretation (T–O–P Link)Linking Interpretation (T–O–P Link)

An interpretation that links the present relationship, the transference relationship, and the past object relationship.

  • Clarify the current pattern
  • Identify its appearance in transference
  • Connect it to an earlier object relationship
  • State the link in one concise interpretation
  • Check the client's emotional response

When to use:

  • When sufficient material exists in all three arenas
  • When the client can tolerate transference work
  • When the central focus is clear

Key phrases:

This happens with your partner, with me, and it resembles what happened with your father.

Follow-up questions:

What do you feel as I make that link?
Does the connection fit or not?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not make full linking interpretations prematurely
  • ⚠️ Avoid overconfident historical claims
  • ⚠️ Return to the client's felt response

Malan, D. Luborsky, L

Working with Resistance: Pressure and ClarificationWorking with Resistance: Pressure and Clarification

A focused sequence for noticing resistance, asking for concrete detail, and returning the client to the central conflict.

  • Notice the resistance
  • Ask for a concrete example
  • Clarify what the resistance protects from
  • Name the cost gently
  • Return to the focus

When to use:

  • When the client becomes vague or intellectual
  • When sessions drift
  • When the central conflict is avoided

Key phrases:

Can we slow down and look at the exact moment?

Follow-up questions:

What are we moving away from?
What feeling might this protect you from?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not shame resistance
  • ⚠️ Do not become punitive about focus
  • ⚠️ Support and confrontation must stay balanced

Malan, D. Strupp, H

Head-On CollisionHead-On Collision

A direct confrontation with the contradiction between the client's wish to change and the defenses that maintain the problem; used more moderately in STPP than in ISTDP.

  • Name the wish for change
  • Name the blocking defense
  • Show the contradiction
  • Ask whether the client wants to keep the pattern
  • Return to the central conflict

When to use:

  • When resistance is persistent
  • When alliance is strong enough
  • When gentle clarification has not moved the work

Key phrases:

Part of you wants change, and part of you protects the old pattern.

Follow-up questions:

Can you see this contradiction?
Which side do you want to support today?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Use less intensively than Davanloo-style ISTDP
  • ⚠️ Do not attack the client
  • ⚠️ Avoid if the client is fragile or ashamed

Malan, D. Davanloo influence in short-term dynamic therapy

Anxiety-Provoking Technique (STAPP)Anxiety-Provoking Technique (STAPP)

Sifneos's active use of anxiety as a motivator for insight and change in carefully selected clients.

  • Identify the avoided conflict
  • Clarify the anxiety around it
  • Use direct questions to increase awareness
  • Keep the anxiety within a tolerable range
  • Connect anxiety with the avoided feeling and relational pattern

When to use:

  • With psychologically minded clients
  • When avoidance is maintained by manageable anxiety
  • When motivation needs activation

Key phrases:

What is so frightening about feeling this directly?

Follow-up questions:

What do you imagine would happen?
Can we stay with the anxiety long enough to understand it?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Not for fragile clients or severe dysregulation
  • ⚠️ Do not provoke anxiety for its own sake
  • ⚠️ Monitor alliance closely

Sifneos, P. (STAPP)

Corrective Emotional Experience (CEE)Corrective Emotional Experience (CEE)

A therapeutic experience in which the client expects the old relational response but encounters something different and emotionally meaningful.

  • Identify the expected old response
  • Notice it in transference
  • Respond differently but authentically
  • Help the client feel the mismatch
  • Link the new experience to the old pattern

When to use:

  • When transference expectations are active
  • When the alliance can hold emotional surprise
  • When insight needs lived experience

Key phrases:

You expected criticism from me, but what actually happened?

Follow-up questions:

Can you feel the difference?
What is it like not to receive the old response?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not manufacture reassurance
  • ⚠️ The therapist response must be genuine
  • ⚠️ Do not bypass interpretation entirely

Alexander & French; Strupp; STPP tradition

Termination as Therapeutic ToolTermination as Therapeutic Tool

Using the planned ending of therapy to work with separation, loss, autonomy, dependency, and the central conflict.

  • Name the number of sessions remaining
  • Ask about feelings regarding ending
  • Link termination reactions to the central conflict
  • Review gains and unfinished themes
  • Plan post-therapy use of insight

When to use:

  • In the final third of STPP
  • When separation themes are central
  • When the client avoids or devalues the ending

Key phrases:

We have N sessions left. What do you feel about ending?

Follow-up questions:

Is this feeling familiar?
How do you usually leave relationships?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not leave termination to the last minutes
  • ⚠️ Do not collude with avoidance of goodbye
  • ⚠️ Do not overextend therapy without a clinical reason

Mann, J. Strupp, H. STPP termination literature

Supportive vs. Expressive Balance (SE Therapy)Supportive vs. Expressive Balance (SE Therapy)

Balancing supportive interventions that stabilize the client with expressive interventions that bring conflict, defense, and transference into awareness.

  • Assess affect tolerance and alliance
  • Use support when the client is overwhelmed
  • Use expressive work when the client can reflect
  • Adjust moment by moment
  • Explain the balance when useful

When to use:

  • Throughout STPP
  • With fluctuating anxiety or shame
  • When the therapist risks being either too soft or too confrontational

Key phrases:

I want to support you and also help us look at the pattern directly.

Follow-up questions:

Do we need to slow down or go closer?
What helps you stay with this without becoming flooded?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Too much support can avoid conflict
  • ⚠️ Too much expressiveness can rupture alliance
  • ⚠️ Reassess balance frequently

Luborsky, L. Supportive-Expressive Therapy

Clarification–Confrontation–Interpretation (CCI Sequence)Clarification–Confrontation–Interpretation (CCI Sequence)

A gradual interpretive sequence: first clarify, then confront contradiction, then interpret meaning.

  • Clarify the facts and feeling
  • Confront contradiction or defense
  • Offer a tentative interpretation
  • Observe the client's response
  • Deepen only if the client can use it

When to use:

  • When moving from surface material to dynamic meaning
  • When premature interpretation would be risky
  • When teaching the client to reflect

Key phrases:

First let us clarify what happened; then we can understand what it means.

Follow-up questions:

What exactly happened?
What is the contradiction?
What might this pattern mean?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not interpret before clarifying
  • ⚠️ Do not confront without support
  • ⚠️ Keep interpretations tentative

Psychodynamic technique tradition; Malan / Luborsky lineages

Selective Attention and NeglectSelective Attention and Neglect

A focus-maintaining technique: attend to material linked to the central conflict and gently neglect material that pulls therapy away from it.

  • Identify material relevant to the focus
  • Respond more fully to focus-linked material
  • Briefly acknowledge unrelated material
  • Return to the central conflict
  • Explain the rationale if needed

When to use:

  • When sessions become scattered
  • When the client brings many topics
  • When time-limited work requires focus

Key phrases:

This matters, and I want to connect it to our focus.

Follow-up questions:

How does this relate to the pattern we are working on?
What part of this belongs to the central conflict?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not ignore risk or urgent material
  • ⚠️ Do not make the client feel dismissed
  • ⚠️ Use warmth when redirecting

Malan, D. brief psychodynamic focus technique

Cyclical Maladaptive Pattern (CMP)Cyclical Maladaptive Pattern (CMP)

Strupp's formulation of a repeated interpersonal cycle that begins with the client's expectation and ends by confirming the very outcome they fear.

  • Identify the client's expectation of others
  • Identify the client's habitual response
  • Identify the effect on others
  • Show how the outcome confirms the expectation
  • Explore alternative responses in the therapeutic relationship

When to use:

  • When interpersonal cycles repeat
  • When the alliance can be used as a live laboratory
  • When the client feels trapped in relational outcomes

Key phrases:

The way you protect yourself may help create the response you fear.

Follow-up questions:

What do others do after you withdraw?
How does that confirm the old expectation?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Avoid blaming the client
  • ⚠️ Hold both vulnerability and agency
  • ⚠️ Use concrete examples

Strupp, H. Time-Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy

Working with TransferenceWorking with Transference

Using the client's live response to the therapist as a focused route into the central conflict.

  • Notice the client's expectation or reaction toward the therapist
  • Name it tentatively
  • Ask for the feeling in the room
  • Link it to current and past relationships
  • Use the new experience to revise the pattern

When to use:

  • When the client reacts strongly to the therapist
  • When the central conflict appears in session
  • When alliance is sufficient

Key phrases:

What do you imagine I am thinking of you right now?

Follow-up questions:

What do you feel toward me as I say this?
Is this familiar from other relationships?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not overinterpret normal relational reactions
  • ⚠️ Do not use transference work without alliance
  • ⚠️ Monitor shame and withdrawal

Malan, D. Strupp, H. Luborsky, L

Anxiety-Regulating InterventionsAnxiety-Regulating Interventions

Supportive and clarifying interventions that keep anxiety within a workable range so expressive psychodynamic work can continue.

  • Notice anxiety signals
  • Name anxiety without pathologizing
  • Slow the pace if needed
  • Ground in concrete details
  • Return to affect or interpretation only when tolerance returns

When to use:

  • When anxiety rises during conflict work
  • When the client becomes confused, flooded, or avoidant
  • When expressive work needs support

Key phrases:

Let us slow down enough that you can stay with this.

Follow-up questions:

Where do you feel the anxiety?
What would help you stay present?

Warnings:

  • ⚠️ Do not mistake regulation for avoidance
  • ⚠️ Do not push through disorganization
  • ⚠️ Return to focus after stabilization

STPP clinical practice; Malan / Strupp traditions

ALLIANCE

FOCUS

INTERVENTIONS

PRESENCE

CLOSING

🔧 Adapted diary
This approach does not define a standardized client diary. We prepared an adapted version based on its key concepts. If you have suggestions, write to us.
Psychodynamic Diary

STPP helps you see how the past influences the present.

By noticing repeated patterns, you loosen old scripts.

Write down the event → feeling → association → link with the past.

Materials are informational and educational and summarize publicly available scientific sources. They are not medical or psychological advice, are not intended for self-diagnosis or self-treatment, and do not replace consultation with a qualified professional.